2010
DOI: 10.1007/s00520-010-0895-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aprepitant against pruritus in patients with solid tumours

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
26
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…of total patientsNo. of responding patientsComplete vs. partial responseItch ScaleResponse by ScaleAge, y/sexPrimary cause of itchDose of aprepitantLength of treatmentPatients with Malignancy Associated ItchDuval et al (2009) [20]33PartialVAS9 to 2N/ACTCL, SS80 mg/d7d7 to 28 to 3Vincenzi et al (2010) [21]22CompleteVAS8 to 044FNSCLC on erlotinibd1: 125 mg; d2, 3: 80 mg; then 125 mg, 80 mg alternating2mPartial9 to 174 MVincenzi et al (2010) [22]22CompleteVAS8 to 0N/A, MMetastatic soft tissue sarcomad1: 125 mg; d2, 3: 80 mg3dPartial9 to 1N/A, FMetastatic breast carcinomaBooken et al (2011) [15]54PartialVASMean 9.8 to 4.356FCTCL, SSd1: 125 mg; d2, 3: 80 mg; every 2 weeksMedian 15w (range 6–24)65FCTCL, SS65 MCTCL, SS51 MCTCL, MFMir et al (2011) [23]11PartialSubjectivePruritus regressed54, N/ANSCLC on erlotinib80 mg/d14dLadizinski et al (2012) [24]11PartialVAS10 to 166 MCTCL, MF80 mg/d; 3×/week4mSantini et al (2012) [14]2441CompleteVASMedian, 8 to 042-76 M/FRefractory itch, metastatic solid tumord1: 125 mg; d3, d5: 80 mg1w21PartialMedian, 8 to 145-70 M/F...…”
Section: Case Presentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…of total patientsNo. of responding patientsComplete vs. partial responseItch ScaleResponse by ScaleAge, y/sexPrimary cause of itchDose of aprepitantLength of treatmentPatients with Malignancy Associated ItchDuval et al (2009) [20]33PartialVAS9 to 2N/ACTCL, SS80 mg/d7d7 to 28 to 3Vincenzi et al (2010) [21]22CompleteVAS8 to 044FNSCLC on erlotinibd1: 125 mg; d2, 3: 80 mg; then 125 mg, 80 mg alternating2mPartial9 to 174 MVincenzi et al (2010) [22]22CompleteVAS8 to 0N/A, MMetastatic soft tissue sarcomad1: 125 mg; d2, 3: 80 mg3dPartial9 to 1N/A, FMetastatic breast carcinomaBooken et al (2011) [15]54PartialVASMean 9.8 to 4.356FCTCL, SSd1: 125 mg; d2, 3: 80 mg; every 2 weeksMedian 15w (range 6–24)65FCTCL, SS65 MCTCL, SS51 MCTCL, MFMir et al (2011) [23]11PartialSubjectivePruritus regressed54, N/ANSCLC on erlotinib80 mg/d14dLadizinski et al (2012) [24]11PartialVAS10 to 166 MCTCL, MF80 mg/d; 3×/week4mSantini et al (2012) [14]2441CompleteVASMedian, 8 to 042-76 M/FRefractory itch, metastatic solid tumord1: 125 mg; d3, d5: 80 mg1w21PartialMedian, 8 to 145-70 M/F...…”
Section: Case Presentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent study showed that aprepitant, a substance P receptor (NK1) antagonist, significantly inhibits scratching behavior in the NC/Nga mouse model of atopic dermatitis (101). More importantly, clinical studies demonstrated that aprepitant is effective for treating chronic pruritus, especially in patients with therapy-refractory pruritus (18, 128, 146). The inhibitory effect of this NK1 receptor antagonist could be caused by inhibition of substance P in the periphery or by blockage of NK1 + neurons in the dorsal spinal cord, which are involved in transmitting the itch sensation.…”
Section: Peripheral Itch Mediators and Related Receptorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aprepitant was also found to be effective in treating malignancy-related pruritus [82, 83]. Consistent with these observations with aprepitant in humans, studies using NG/Nga mice, a murine model of atopic dermatitis, demonstrated that administration of NK1 receptor antagonist reduced scratching behaviour [84].…”
Section: Biological Mediators Of Itchmentioning
confidence: 88%