Apps to Support Self-Management for People With Hypertension: Content Analysis

Abstract

BackgroundHome blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) is one component of effective supported self-management, which may potentially be mediated by mobile apps.ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to identify the self-management features (HBPM and broader support strategies) offered by currently available apps and to determine the features associated with download frequency and user ratings.MethodsWe searched Google Play store, Apple App store, National Health Services Apps Library and myhealthapps.net (first search on February 1, 2018; updated August 18, 2018). We included high blood pressure apps available in the United Kingdom and extracted their features, number of downloads, and the average users’ rating from the app stores. We mapped the features to the holistic Practical Reviews In Self-Management Support (PRISMS) taxonomy of self-management support. We employed a regression analysis to determine if any features were associated with download frequency or user rating.ResultsWe included 151 apps. The 3 most common features were as follows: monitoring blood pressure (BP) and charting logs; lifestyle (exercise or dietary) advice; and providing information about hypertension. The other 11 components of the PRISMS taxonomy were rarely featured. There was little evidence to support associations between specific features and the download statistics and rating scores, with only 2 uncommon features achieving borderline significant associations. The presence of social support features, such as a forum, was weakly but significantly (R2=.04, P=.02) correlated with the number of downloads. Apps designed specifically for particular BP monitors/smart watches were weakly associated with a higher rating score (R2=.05, P<.001). Apps with more ratings were associated with more downloads (R2=.91, P<.001).ConclusionsThe functionality of currently available apps is limited to logging BP, offering lifestyle advice, and providing information about hypertension. Future app development should consider broadening the remit to produce a system that can respond flexibly to the diversity of support that enables people to self-manage their hypertension.

A WeChat-Based Self-Management Intervention for Community Middle-Aged and Elderly Adults with Hypertension in Guangzhou, China: A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial

“…There are more than 100 apps supporting self-management (e.g., logging BP, lifestyle advice, and hypertension information) for hypertensive patients in app stores around the world [12,13]. However, these apps have no evidence to confirm their effectiveness and lack a clear theoretical basis to ensure their security.…”

Evidence and Recommendations on the Use of Telemedicine for the Management of Arterial Hypertension

“…This means that telemedicine equipment must be developed, validated and certified according to the recommendations and indications of regulatory bodies. This is particularly relevant for health apps: they are growing rapidly on the market, but the majority of them lack an appropriate test for efficacy and quality and are often labeled as wellness or fitness products to circumvent regulation when, indeed, most of them act as medical devices [75]. These considerations strongly emphasize the importance of scientific validation for health apps content, and the need of demonstrating their usefulness through properly designed clinical studies [76][77][78].…”

A Systematic Review on Mobile Health Applications’ Education Program for Patients Taking Oral Anticoagulants

“…However, despite their potential, mHealth applications often lack the necessary components of self-management required to support patients with long-term conditions, such as customized medical devices [16]. The quality required by the target population used must be guaranteed for mHealth applications to function properly as a medical device.…”