2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2019.07.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Approximation to stable law by the Lindeberg principle

Abstract: By Lindeberg principle, we develop in this paper an approximation to one dimensional (possibly) asymmetric α-stable distributions with α ∈ (0, 2) in smooth Wasserstein distance, which implies the stable central limit theorem. Our main tools are Taylor-like expansion and Dynkin's formula of stable process.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…= 0, and the equation has a unique solution: 16) then (C.6) and (C.9) imply u ∈ L 2 loc ([0, ∞) × (Ω, F , P); R d ). Since ∇ v X x r = J x 0,r v and J x 0,r J x r,t = J x 0,t , for all 0 r t, we have…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…= 0, and the equation has a unique solution: 16) then (C.6) and (C.9) imply u ∈ L 2 loc ([0, ∞) × (Ω, F , P); R d ). Since ∇ v X x r = J x 0,r v and J x 0,r J x r,t = J x 0,t , for all 0 r t, we have…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recall (C. 16) and (C.18), it is easy to see that D U 2 I x v 1 (t) can be computed by (C.14) as Let v 1 , v 2 , v 3 ∈ R d , and define u i and U i as (C.16) and (C.12), respectively, for i = 1, 2, 3. From (C.8), we can similarly define D U 3 ∇ v 2 ∇ v 1 X x s , which satisfies the following equation: for s ∈ [0, t],…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…On the other hand, if Θ is a singleton, (X t ) t≥0 is a classical Lévy process with triplet Θ, and X 1 is an α-stable random variable. The convergence rate of the classical α-stable central limit theorem has been studied in the Kolmogorov distance (see, e.g., [13, 15-17, 21, 24]) and in the Wasserstein-1 distance or the smooth Wasserstein distance (see, e.g., [1,10,11,23,30,38]). The first type is proved by the characteristic functions that do not exist in the sublinear framework, while the second type relies on Stein's method, which fails under the sublinear setting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%