2012
DOI: 10.1108/s0731-9053(2012)0000028010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Approximation Properties of Laplace-Type Estimators

Abstract: The Laplace-type estimator (LTE) is a simulation-based alternative to the classical extremum estimator that has gained popularity in applied research. We show that even though the estimator has desirable asymptotic properties, in small samples the point estimate provided by LTE may not necessarily converge to the extremum of the sample objective function. Furthermore, we suggest a simple test to verify if the estimator converges. We illustrate these results by estimating a prototype dynamic stochastic general … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One must instead rely on derivative-free methods (such as the Nelder-Mead simplex method); random search algorithms (such as simulated annealing); or abandon optimization altogether, and instead implement a Laplace-type estimator, via Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC; see Chernozhukov and Hong, 2003). But convergence of derivative-free methods is often very slow; while MCMC, even when it converges, may produce (in finite samples) an estimator substantially different from the optimum of the statistical criterion to which it is applied (see Kormiltsina and Nekipelov, 2012). Thus, the non-smoothness of the criterion functions that define II estimators render them very difficult to use in the case of discrete data.…”
Section: Indirect Inference For Discrete Choice Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One must instead rely on derivative-free methods (such as the Nelder-Mead simplex method); random search algorithms (such as simulated annealing); or abandon optimization altogether, and instead implement a Laplace-type estimator, via Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC; see Chernozhukov and Hong, 2003). But convergence of derivative-free methods is often very slow; while MCMC, even when it converges, may produce (in finite samples) an estimator substantially different from the optimum of the statistical criterion to which it is applied (see Kormiltsina and Nekipelov, 2012). Thus, the non-smoothness of the criterion functions that define II estimators render them very difficult to use in the case of discrete data.…”
Section: Indirect Inference For Discrete Choice Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the business cycle literature, a wide range of values for the elasticity of substitution between different types of labor ( ) has been used. For example, Adolfson et al (2007) use the value 21 in a model calibrated for the euro area, Kormilitsina and Nekipelov (2012) use 6 and Coenen et al (2010) use 3. We set the parameter to 9, which is near the middle of the range used in the literature.…”
Section: Parameter Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the business cycle literature, a wide range of values for the elasticity of substitution between different types of labor (𝜖 đ‘€ ) has been used. For example, Adolfson et al (2007) use the value 21 in a model calibrated for the euro area, Kormilitsina and Nekipelov (2012) use 6 and Coenen et al ( 2010) use 3. We set the parameter to 9, which is near the middle of the range used in the literature.…”
Section: Parameter Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%