2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jat.2008.10.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Approximation of Sobolev classes by polynomials and ridge functions

Abstract: Let W r p (B d ) be the usual Sobolev class of functions on the unit ball B d in R d , and W •,r p (B d ) be the subclass of all radial functions in W r p (B d ). We show that for the classes W •,r p (B d ) and W r p (B d ), the orders of best approximation by polynomials in L q (B d ) coincide. We also obtain exact orders of best approximation in L 2 (B d ) of the classes W •,r p (B d ) by ridge functions and, as an immediate consequence, we obtain the same orders in L 2 (B d ) for the usual Sobolev classes W… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Smoothness or regularity is a widely used feature that has been adopted in a vast literature [3], [4], [15], [16], [28], [29], [49]. To present the approximation result, we at first introduce the following definition.…”
Section: A Limitations Of Deep Nets Approximationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Smoothness or regularity is a widely used feature that has been adopted in a vast literature [3], [4], [15], [16], [28], [29], [49]. To present the approximation result, we at first introduce the following definition.…”
Section: A Limitations Of Deep Nets Approximationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mathematically, rotationinvariant property corresponds to a radial function which is by definition a function whose value at each point depends only on the distance between that point and the origin. In the nice papers [15], [16], shallow nets were proved to be incapable of embodying rotation-invariance features. To show the power of depth in approximating radial functions, we present the definition of smooth radial function as follows.…”
Section: B a Fast Review For Realizing Data Features By Deep Netsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We point out that the above Lipschitz continuous assumption is standard for radial basis functions (RBF's) in Approximation Theory, and was adopted in [13,14] to quantify the approximation abilities of polynomials and ridge functions. For U, V ⊆ L p (B d ) and 1 ≤ p ≤ ∞, we denote by…”
Section: Lower Bounds For Approximation By Deep Netsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Affine transformation-invariance, and particularly rotation-invariance, is an important data feature, prevalent in such areas as statistical physics [18], early warning of earthquakes [28], 3-D point-cloud segmentation [27], and image rendering [22]. Theoretically, neural networks with one hidden layer (to be called shallow nets) are incapable of embodying rotation-invariance features in the sense that its performance in handling these features is analogous to the failure of algebraic polynomials [13] in handling this task [14]. The primary goal of this paper is to construct neural networks with at least two hidden layers (called deep nets) to realize rotation-invariant features by deriving "fast" approximation and learning rates of radial functions as target functions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results revealed that in order to approximate functions in the Sobolev space, radial functions manifolds and ridge functions manifolds have the same approximation capacity (see [12] and [13]). In [10], the upper and lower bounds of approximation by ridge function manifolds have been established in a larger Sobolev space than that of [12]. Thus it is natural to arise the question: does this upper bound and lower bound also hold for RFMs?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%