2006
DOI: 10.1080/14689360500141772
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Approximation of box dimension of attractors using the subdivision algorithm

Abstract: In this paper we use the subdivision algorithm to approximate the box dimension of attractors of dynamical systems. Although in theory the subdivision algorithm provides a covering of the attractor with boxes of arbitrarily small diameter, in practice we have to overcome two obstructions: (1) ensure that the covering is (almost) minimal and (2) enhance the speed of convergence to the box dimension. We solve both problems and apply our results to the He´non, Lorenz, Ro¨ssler and Chua attractors. The method sugg… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(21 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Let Assumption 5 hold. Then, for any compact invariant set S 0 of the map (27), the following inequality is valid…”
Section: The Smoothened Lozi Mapmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Let Assumption 5 hold. Then, for any compact invariant set S 0 of the map (27), the following inequality is valid…”
Section: The Smoothened Lozi Mapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, there are still no general analytical techniques for computing the two aforementioned dimensions for chaotic attractors. Numerical methods remain the main tool used by scientists and engineers to estimate these dimensions [27]. In this paper, an alternative to this numerical approach is developed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly in this paper, we optimize the solution with respect to LQR performance. Unlike in [16], we divide state space into simple boxes as it is performed in [17]. Partitioning of state space is used also in [18], where authors define time-varying piecewise affine (PWA) feedback control law defined over nonconvex regions for hybrid systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Partitioning of state space is used also in [18], where authors define time-varying piecewise affine (PWA) feedback control law defined over nonconvex regions for hybrid systems. 933 We follow the state space discretization approach but apply a more direct subdivision algorithm, proposed by the author and collaborators in [17], that bypasses the need to apply a graph algorithm. Although the algorithm introduced in [10] provides solutions if the state space is sufficiently partitioned, with our approach, we show that it is feasible to find optimal control even for coarse divisions of the state space, and we show how overall performance improves when the state space is further subdivided, which is not possible with [10] approach due to already mentioned need for sufficient partitioning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difficulty of using these dimensions is that it can often not be computed analytically and one has to employ numerical methods to obtain estimates of the dimension (see e.g. [27]). Another solution is to use the Lyapunov dimension which upper bounds the two previous dimensions [13].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%