2011
DOI: 10.2478/s12175-011-0031-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Approximation in weighted Orlicz spaces

Abstract: ABSTRACT. We prove some direct and converse theorems of trigonometric approximation in weighted Orlicz spaces with weights satisfying so called Muckenhoupt's A p condition.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(12 reference statements)
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering Example 5 of §2, clearly (1.3) improves the inequality (1.4) for r ≥ 2. Similarly (1.3) also improves direct theorems obtained in [3,4,5,17,18] for r ≥ 2.…”
Section: Introduction and The Main Resultssupporting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Considering Example 5 of §2, clearly (1.3) improves the inequality (1.4) for r ≥ 2. Similarly (1.3) also improves direct theorems obtained in [3,4,5,17,18] for r ≥ 2.…”
Section: Introduction and The Main Resultssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…So the Orlicz norm (2.4) satisfies the property (I'). If the conditions ϕ α quasiconvex for some α ∈ (0, 1), ϕ ∈ ∆ 2 and ω ∈ A p(ϕ) are fulfilled, then the properties (II)-(VI) were proved in [5]. Let M be a N -function.…”
Section: Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the more general Orlicz spaces, similar problems are investigated for Muckenhoupt weights. The direct and inverse theorems of trigonometric approximation (with Gadjieva modulus) in Orlicz spaces with Muckenhoupt weights were proved in [IG] (weight is inside and M is convex Young function) and [AI1] (weight is outside and M is quasiconvex Young function). Also some inverse theorems of trigonometric approximation of functions and its fractional derivatives in Orlicz spaces with Muckenhoupt weights were proved in [AI].…”
Section: Introduction and The Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This modulus of smoothness is well defined, because σ h is a bounded linear operator on L ϕ,ω (T) under the conditions that ϕ ∈ ∆ 2 , ϕ α is quasiconvex for some α, 0 < α < 1, and ω ∈ A p(ϕ) ( [1]). We define the shift operator σ h and the modulus of smoothness Ω r ϕ,ω in this way, because the space L ϕ,ω (T) is not, in general, invariant under the usual shift f (x) → f (x + h).…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%