2021
DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-349610/v1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Approximation-free Quantitative Prescribed Performance Control of Unknown Strict-feedback Systems

Abstract: Prescribed performance control (PPC) has been proved to be a powerful tool which seeks transient performance for tracking errors. Unfortunately, the existing PPC schemes only can qualitatively design transient performance, while they cannot quantitatively set the convergence time and meanwhile minimize overshoot. In this article, we propose a new quantitative PPC strategy for unknown strict-feedback systems, capable of quantitatively designing convergence time and minimizing overshoot. Firstly, a new quantitat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(59 reference statements)
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To achieve the predefined transient and steady state performance of the AUV trajectory tracking, the tracking errors αe,(α=ρ,θ,ψ)$$ {\alpha}_e,\left(\alpha =\rho, \theta, \psi \right) $$ are required to be fulfilled the constraint α_false(tfalse)αefalse(tfalse)trueαfalse(tfalse)$$ \underset{\_}{\alpha }(t)\le {\alpha}_e(t)\le \overline{\alpha}(t) $$. Inspired by References 20 and 25, the asymmetric boundary functions (ABFs) are designed as: leftalignedrightalign-oddtrueα(t)=()pα(t)prefix−pα0.2emsign0.2em()αe(0)+pα(t)truenormalΛαα_(t)=()pα(t)prefix−pα0.2emsign0.2em()αe(0)prefix−pα(t)normalΛ_α$$ \left\{\begin{array}{l}\overline{\alpha}(t)=\left({p}_{\alpha }(t)-{p}_{\infty}^{\alpha}\right)\kern0.2em \operatorname{sign}\kern0.2em \left({\alpha}_e(0)\right)+{p}_{\alpha }(t){\overline{\Lambda}}_{\alpha}\\ {}\underset{\_}{\alpha }(t)=\left({p}_{\alpha }(t)-{p}_{\infty}^...…”
Section: Problem Formulation and Mathematical Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To achieve the predefined transient and steady state performance of the AUV trajectory tracking, the tracking errors αe,(α=ρ,θ,ψ)$$ {\alpha}_e,\left(\alpha =\rho, \theta, \psi \right) $$ are required to be fulfilled the constraint α_false(tfalse)αefalse(tfalse)trueαfalse(tfalse)$$ \underset{\_}{\alpha }(t)\le {\alpha}_e(t)\le \overline{\alpha}(t) $$. Inspired by References 20 and 25, the asymmetric boundary functions (ABFs) are designed as: leftalignedrightalign-oddtrueα(t)=()pα(t)prefix−pα0.2emsign0.2em()αe(0)+pα(t)truenormalΛαα_(t)=()pα(t)prefix−pα0.2emsign0.2em()αe(0)prefix−pα(t)normalΛ_α$$ \left\{\begin{array}{l}\overline{\alpha}(t)=\left({p}_{\alpha }(t)-{p}_{\infty}^{\alpha}\right)\kern0.2em \operatorname{sign}\kern0.2em \left({\alpha}_e(0)\right)+{p}_{\alpha }(t){\overline{\Lambda}}_{\alpha}\\ {}\underset{\_}{\alpha }(t)=\left({p}_{\alpha }(t)-{p}_{\infty}^...…”
Section: Problem Formulation and Mathematical Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, the conservative design approach used in the former may lead to unnecessary overshooting due to excessive control gains, even though the tracking error does not exceed the preset boundary layer. To mitigate design conservatism and minimize overshoot of tracking error, a promising asymmetrical prescribed performance control (APPC) method was implemented in References 20 and 25. This approach provides a predefined quantitative specification of tracking behavior and addresses the limitations of traditional funnel‐based PPC schemes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%