2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.peva.2010.05.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Approximation for a two-class weighted fair queueing discipline

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This scheduling discipline is very important to understand how heterogeneous elastic traffic converges and competes for the use of the same‐shared transmission resources. Class‐based weighted fair queuing may be able to meet the QoS measures needed by the different elastic traffic types …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This scheduling discipline is very important to understand how heterogeneous elastic traffic converges and competes for the use of the same‐shared transmission resources. Class‐based weighted fair queuing may be able to meet the QoS measures needed by the different elastic traffic types …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the issue of resource allocation in CBWFQ system cannot be addressed without taking into account the random and the dynamic nature of ongoing flows, studying the flow level performance of elastic traffic under such system (or an equivalent system) has not received much attention in literature. Class‐based weighted fair queuing system has been extensively studied at packet level by evaluating several criteria of effectiveness such as the mean queue length and the average queue waiting time, without proposing a general model that captures the flow‐level dynamics (arrivals and departures of flows) and the real coupling aspect between different queues.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We mention, among others, priority scheduling (see, e.g., [4,8,11,13,15]), weighted fair queueing (WFQ) (see, e.g., [14,17]), random order of service (ROS) (see, e.g., [1,3,10]), and generalized processor sharing (GPS) (see, e.g., [9,12,16]). Strangely enough, only few results have been derived for multi-class First-Come-First-Served (FCFS) systems, i.e., queueing systems in which the customers of different classes are accommodated in one queue and served in their order of arrival, irrespective of the classes they belong to (a recent paper is [5]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…weighted round-robin [17,31], deficit round-robin [47] and smoothed round-robin [22]), generalised processor sharing (GPS) [18], packet-by-packet generalized processor sharing (P-GPS) [15], class-based weighted fair queuing (CBWFQ) [46], virtual clock [64] and self-clocked fair queuing [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. , w N , data flow i will achieve an average data rate of R * w i /(w 1 þ w 2 þ · · · þ w N ), where R is the data link rate) [46] have been adopted by the industry and implemented in most commercial products (e.g. [4,7,8,14,24,25,42]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%