2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-21398-9_15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Approximation Algorithms for the Connected Sensor Cover Problem

Abstract: Abstract. We study the minimum connected sensor cover problem (MIN-CSC) and the budgeted connected sensor cover (Budgeted-CSC) problem, both motivated by important applications in wireless sensor networks. In both problems, we are given a set of sensors and a set of target points in the Euclidean plane. In MIN-CSC, our goal is to find a set of sensors of minimum cardinality, such that all target points are covered, and all sensors can communicate with each other (i.e., the communication graph is connected). We… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the objective function of the problem considered in this paper may not be a special submodular function. In addition, Huang et al [12] investigated the problem of placing K sensors to monitor targets so that the number of targets covered by the K sensors is maximized and the network formed by the K placed sensors is connected, where a target is covered by a sensor if their Euclidean distance is no more than a given sensing range R s , and two sensors can communicate with each other if their Euclidean distance is no greater than a given communication range R c , and R s ≤ R c . They proposed a 1−1/e 8( 2 √ 2α +1) 2 -approximation algorithm, where α = Rs Rc , and the ratio thus is between…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, the objective function of the problem considered in this paper may not be a special submodular function. In addition, Huang et al [12] investigated the problem of placing K sensors to monitor targets so that the number of targets covered by the K sensors is maximized and the network formed by the K placed sensors is connected, where a target is covered by a sensor if their Euclidean distance is no more than a given sensing range R s , and two sensors can communicate with each other if their Euclidean distance is no greater than a given communication range R c , and R s ≤ R c . They proposed a 1−1/e 8( 2 √ 2α +1) 2 -approximation algorithm, where α = Rs Rc , and the ratio thus is between…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…128 , when α = Rs Rc = 1, which indicates that the performance of the solutions delivered by the both algorithms may be far from the optimal solution. Therefore, the both algorithms in [12] and [37], [38] are applicable to the case with many to-be-placed sensors, i.e., the value of K is very large, e.g., K = 10, 000. Notice that there are usually tens or hundreds of UAVs to-be-deployed in a real UAV network, and the approximation ratio ) -approximation algorithm in [17], the main technical differences between them are twofold.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hence it is natural to investigate approximation algorithms for the VC-weighted Steiner tree problem in these graph classes. Moreover, unit disk graphs are regarded as a reasonable model of wireless networks, and the vertex-weighted Steiner tree problem in unit disk graphs has been actively studied in this context (see, e.g., [1,14,22,23,24]). Since our problem is motivated by an application in communication networks, it is reasonable to investigate the problem in unit disk graphs.…”
Section: Our Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To solve the connected dominating set problem, we present a linear programming (LP) rounding algorithm. This algorithm relies on an idea presented by Huang, Li, and Shi [14], who considered a variant of the connected dominating set problem in unit disk graphs. Although their algorithm is only for minimizing the number of vertices in a solution, we prove that it can be extended to our problem.…”
Section: Our Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%