2022
DOI: 10.1007/s12652-022-04412-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Approximating parameters of photovoltaic models using an amended reptile search algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To provide a comprehensive comparison, Table 8 compares the estimated parameters and RMSE values for the SDM obtained using the GOANM algorithm with other more recent optimization approaches, including gradient based optimizer with criss‐cross and NM algorithms (CCNMGBO) [41], improved moth flame algorithm (IMFOL) [42], ranking teaching–learning‐based optimization (RTLBO) [43], dynamic leader multi‐verse optimizer (DLMVO) [45], reptile search algorithm with Cauchy mutation and opposition‐based learning strategies (OBL‐RSACM) [46], chaos game optimization‐least squares (CGO‐LS) [47], artificial humming bird optimization (AHO) [48], particle swarm optimization with random reselection (PSOCS) [49], elite learning adaptive differential evolution (ELADE) [50], coyote optimization algorithm (COA) [51], gradient based optimizer with differential evolution and sine cosine algorithm (SDGBO) [44], hunger games search algorithm with quantum Nelder–Mead (IHGS) [52], bald eagle search (BES) [53], differential evolution (DE) [56], improved tunicate swarm optimization (ITSA) [54], tree seed inspired algorithm (TSA) [55]. The results highlight the GOANM's superior performance, as it achieves the lowest RMSE value among all the compared methods.…”
Section: Experimental Results and Statistical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To provide a comprehensive comparison, Table 8 compares the estimated parameters and RMSE values for the SDM obtained using the GOANM algorithm with other more recent optimization approaches, including gradient based optimizer with criss‐cross and NM algorithms (CCNMGBO) [41], improved moth flame algorithm (IMFOL) [42], ranking teaching–learning‐based optimization (RTLBO) [43], dynamic leader multi‐verse optimizer (DLMVO) [45], reptile search algorithm with Cauchy mutation and opposition‐based learning strategies (OBL‐RSACM) [46], chaos game optimization‐least squares (CGO‐LS) [47], artificial humming bird optimization (AHO) [48], particle swarm optimization with random reselection (PSOCS) [49], elite learning adaptive differential evolution (ELADE) [50], coyote optimization algorithm (COA) [51], gradient based optimizer with differential evolution and sine cosine algorithm (SDGBO) [44], hunger games search algorithm with quantum Nelder–Mead (IHGS) [52], bald eagle search (BES) [53], differential evolution (DE) [56], improved tunicate swarm optimization (ITSA) [54], tree seed inspired algorithm (TSA) [55]. The results highlight the GOANM's superior performance, as it achieves the lowest RMSE value among all the compared methods.…”
Section: Experimental Results and Statistical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 16 provides a comparison of the estimated parameters and RMSE values for the PV module obtained using the GOANM algorithm with other more recent optimization approaches, including CCNMGBO [41], IMFOL [42], RTLBO [43], DLMVO [45], OBL‐RSACM [46], CGO‐LS [47], AHO [48], PSOCS [49], ELADE [50], COA [51], SDGBO [44], IHGS [52], BES [53], DE [56], ITSA [54], TSA [55]. The results show that the GOANM algorithm achieves the lowest RMSE value among the compared methods, indicating its superior performance in accurately modelling the Photowatt‐PWP201 PV module.…”
Section: Experimental Results and Statistical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For instance, Newton Raphson and Levenberg–Marquardt damping parameter are combined in 27 to get accurate values of unknown parameters of SDM and DDM model of solar PV. In the same line, hybridization of opposition-based learning reptile search algorithm and Cauchy mutation strategy is presented in 28 , a hybrid approach, based on modified third order Newton Raphson has been given in 29 . Recently, some recent artificial intelligent techniques, such as sanitized teacher learning-based optimization 30 , jellyfish search optimizer 31 , success-history adaptation differential evolution with linear population size reduction 32 have also been in the research to get accurate values of the unknown parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, when using VMD method to decompose signals, it is necessary to manually select the number of decomposition layers and other parameters. It is worth noting that the reasonable selection of model parameters is critical to the whole detection system (Chauhan et al, 2022). To sum up, although the above traditional models have achieved good detection results, they are relatively dependent on signal processing and artificial feature extraction, and the model lacks universality and intelligence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%