2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-20877-5_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Approximating Edge Dominating Set in Dense Graphs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By this result and Theorem 1, we get the following corollary. Note that under UGC, since min vertex cover cannot be approximated to within 2 − ε for any ε > 0 [18], we get that for any ε > 0, edge dominating set is not (3/2 − ε)-approximable in polynomial time, which is the same lower bound recently achieved in [22].…”
supporting
confidence: 70%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…By this result and Theorem 1, we get the following corollary. Note that under UGC, since min vertex cover cannot be approximated to within 2 − ε for any ε > 0 [18], we get that for any ε > 0, edge dominating set is not (3/2 − ε)-approximable in polynomial time, which is the same lower bound recently achieved in [22].…”
supporting
confidence: 70%
“…Carr et al [7] proved a (2 + 1 10 )-approximation algorithm for weighted edge dominating set (the generalization of edge dominating set where weights are assigned to the edges of the input graph and the objective becomes to determine a minimum total-weight edge dominating set), the ratio of which was later improved to 2 by Fujito and Nagamochi [16]. Improved results have also been obtained in sparse graphs [6] and in dense graphs [22]. However, providing an approximation algorithm with ratio (strictly) smaller than 2, or proving that such algorithm does not exist (under some likely complexity hypothesis) still remains as an open problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…which implies (2). Equality in (2) implies equality in (11), which, by Theorem 5, implies that every component of G ′ is either K ∆−1,∆−1 or K ∆ , where ∆ has to be even in the latter case. Since G is ∆-regular, and there are exactly 2∆ − 2 edges between {u, v} and…”
Section: Proofsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…32 and 33] Table 2: Complexity status for various values of p and q: on tournaments Related Work: On undirected graphs Edge Dominating Set, also known as Maximum Minimal Matching, is NP-complete even on bipartite, planar, bounded degree graphs as well as other special cases [37,25]. It can be approximated within a factor of 2 [20] (or better in some special cases [9,32,2]), but not a factor better than 7/6 [10] unless P=NP. The problem has been the subject of intense study in the parameterized and exact algorithms community [35], producing a series of improved FPT algorithms [18,4,19,33]; the current best is given in [26].…”
Section: Range Of P Qmentioning
confidence: 99%