Proceedings of the 51st Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing 2019
DOI: 10.1145/3313276.3316373
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Approximating APSP without scaling: equivalence of approximate min-plus and exact min-max

Abstract: Zwick's (1+ε)-approximation algorithm for the All Pairs Shortest Path (APSP) problem runs in time O( n ω ε log W ), where ω ≤ 2.373 is the exponent of matrix multiplication and W denotes the largest weight. This can be used to approximate several graph characteristics including the diameter, radius, median, minimum-weight triangle, and minimum-weight cycle in the same time bound.Since Zwick's algorithm uses the scaling technique, it has a factor log W in the running time. In this paper, we study whether APSP a… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
(101 reference statements)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first example is the approximate positive APSP problem where the goal is to compute a 1 ± approximation of the distances for a graph with positive weights. A recent result by Bringmann, Künnemann, and Wegrzycki [2] shows that approximate positive APSP can be solved in Õ n poly( ) time 1 . The algorithm in [2] is obtained by showing an equivalance between approximate positive APSP and the (min,max)-product problem which is defined as follows.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first example is the approximate positive APSP problem where the goal is to compute a 1 ± approximation of the distances for a graph with positive weights. A recent result by Bringmann, Künnemann, and Wegrzycki [2] shows that approximate positive APSP can be solved in Õ n poly( ) time 1 . The algorithm in [2] is obtained by showing an equivalance between approximate positive APSP and the (min,max)-product problem which is defined as follows.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dominance product has algorithm with complexity O(n (3+ω)/2 ) = O(n 2.686 ) [13], and has been slightly improved by rectangular matrix multiplication [19]. The complexity of O(n (3+ω)/2 ), which is the exponential "middle point" between cubic time and FMM, is the current time complexity for many problems, such as all-pair bottleneck path [15,7], all-pair non-decreasing path [18,8], approximate APSP without scaling [4]. Recently, solving linear program is also shown to have current running time same as FMM [5,11].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One can improve upon this for graphs with small integer weights using matrix multiplication [17,28,44]. A subcubic-time (1 + ǫ)-approximation can also be achieved this way [11,50]. Much of the recent work regarded approximating the minimum weight cycle within factor at least 2 [14,15,18].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%