2019
DOI: 10.3386/w26426
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Approximately Right?: Global v. Local Methods for Open-Economy Models with Incomplete Markets

Abstract: Global and local methods are widely used in international macroeconomics to analyze incompletemarkets models. We study solutions for an endowment economy, an RBC model and a Sudden Stops model with an occasionally binding credit constraint. First-order, second-order, risky steady state (RSS), and DynareOBC solutions are compared v. xed-point-iteration global solutions in the time and frequency domains. The solutions dier in key respects, including measures of precautionary savings, cyclical moments, impulse re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…de Groot et al (2019) compare the performance of local approximations and EPFP methods with the global solution of open-economy models with incomplete markets and occasionally binding borrowing constraints. Their results show that simulated moments from local and EPFP methods can differ substantially from those obtained using global solutions and advise in favor of solving this class of models using the original nonlinear equilibrium conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…de Groot et al (2019) compare the performance of local approximations and EPFP methods with the global solution of open-economy models with incomplete markets and occasionally binding borrowing constraints. Their results show that simulated moments from local and EPFP methods can differ substantially from those obtained using global solutions and advise in favor of solving this class of models using the original nonlinear equilibrium conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%