2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11856-021-2144-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Approximate Spielman-Teng theorems for the least singular value of random combinatorial matrices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The methods we use in this paper can be further developed in various directions. In a recent work [8], the first two named authors utilized and extended some of the ideas introduced here in order to provide the best known upper bound for the well studied problem of estimating the singularity probability of random symmetric {±1}-valued matrices, and in upcoming work [11], the second named author uses some of the results in this paper to study the non-asymptotic behavior of the least singular value of different models of discrete random matrices. In another upcoming work of the second named author [10], it is shown how to extend the techniques introduced here and in [11] to study not-necessarily-discrete models of random matrices.…”
Section: Further Directions and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The methods we use in this paper can be further developed in various directions. In a recent work [8], the first two named authors utilized and extended some of the ideas introduced here in order to provide the best known upper bound for the well studied problem of estimating the singularity probability of random symmetric {±1}-valued matrices, and in upcoming work [11], the second named author uses some of the results in this paper to study the non-asymptotic behavior of the least singular value of different models of discrete random matrices. In another upcoming work of the second named author [10], it is shown how to extend the techniques introduced here and in [11] to study not-necessarily-discrete models of random matrices.…”
Section: Further Directions and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent work [8], the first two named authors utilized and extended some of the ideas introduced here in order to provide the best known upper bound for the well studied problem of estimating the singularity probability of random symmetric {±1}-valued matrices, and in upcoming work [11], the second named author uses some of the results in this paper to study the non-asymptotic behavior of the least singular value of different models of discrete random matrices. In another upcoming work of the second named author [10], it is shown how to extend the techniques introduced here and in [11] to study not-necessarily-discrete models of random matrices. We also anticipate that the techniques presented here (along with some additional combinatorial ideas) should suffice to provide an 'exponential-type' upper bound on the probability of singularity of the adjacency matrix of a dense random regular digraph, thereby making substantial progress towards a conjecture of Cook [4,Conjecture 1.7].…”
Section: Further Directions and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study of such matrices was initiated by Nguyen [19], who proved that if d = n/2 then Q is asymptotically almost surely nonsingular (where n → ∞ along the even integers). Strengthenings of Nguyen's theorem have been proved by several authors; see for example [2,10,12,13,23]. Recently, Aigner-Horev and Person [2] conjectured an analogue of Theorem 1.1 for sparse random combinatorial matrices, which we prove in this note.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…We often deal with a model in which the variables to which we wish to apply hypercontractivity are not independent, but constrained to have a fixed sum. Rather than use hypercontractivity on the slice, we use a trick of Jain [16] which allows one to transfer bounds from the independent model to a fixed sum model via a simple conditioning argument. See the proof of [16, Lemma 5.4] for an example of this trick.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%