A study on vortex injection in hybrid rocket engines with nitrous oxide and paraffin has been performed. The investigation followed two paths: first, the flowfield was simulated with a commercial computational fluid dynamics code; then, burn tests were performed on a laboratory-scale rocket. The computational fluid dynamics analysis had the dual purpose to help the design of the laboratory motor and to understand the physics underlying the vortex flow coupled with the combustion process compared with axial injection. Vortex injection produces a more diffuse flame in the combustion chamber and improves the mixing process of the reactants, both aspects concurring to increase the c efficiency. A helical streamline develops downstream of the injection region, and the pitch is highly influenced by combustion, which straightens the flow due to the acceleration in the axial direction imposed by the temperature rise. Experimental tests with similar geometry have been performed. Measured performance shows an increase in regression rate up to 51% and a c efficiency that rises from less than 80% with axial injection up to more than 90% with vortex injection. Moreover, a reduction of the instabilities in the chamber pressure has been measured.
Nomenclature
A t= nozzle throat area a = multiplication coefficient for regression rate G ox = mass flux in combustion chamber L g = grain length M f = mass of burned fuel M m = molar mass _ m tot = mean total mass flow n = exponential coefficient for regression rate O∕F = oxidizer to fuel mass ratio p, pc = pressure, mean chamber pressure R u = universal gas constant r = radial coordinate T = temperature t = time u r , u z , u θ = radial, tangential, and axial velocity z = axial coordinate μ = dynamic viscosity ρ f = density of fuel ρ = density ϕ i , ϕ e , ϕ m = initial, final, and mean diameter of the grain ω = vortex angular velocity