2009 American Control Conference 2009
DOI: 10.1109/acc.2009.5160681
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Approximate solution of hyper-sensitive optimal control problems using finite-time Lyapunov analysis

Abstract: Abstract-Solving optimal control problems by an indirect method is often abandoned in favor of a direct method due to hyper-sensitivity with respect to unknown boundary conditions for the Hamiltonian boundary-value problem that represents the first-order necessary conditions. Yet the hyper-sensitivity may imply a manifold structure for the flow in the Hamiltonian phase space, structure that provides insight regarding the optimal solutions and suggests a solution approximation strategy that avoids the hyper-sen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(26 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Generally, the hypersensitive HJBs can be further divided into completely hypersensitive HJBs and partially hypersensetive HJBs, and here we will focus on the completely hypersensitive HJBs. It has been found that the solution of a completely hypersensitive HJB can be approximated by three phases along the time, including stable phase, unstable phase, and equilibrium point [21], expressed as…”
Section: Supervised Learning Based Hamiltonian (Slh)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, the hypersensitive HJBs can be further divided into completely hypersensitive HJBs and partially hypersensetive HJBs, and here we will focus on the completely hypersensitive HJBs. It has been found that the solution of a completely hypersensitive HJB can be approximated by three phases along the time, including stable phase, unstable phase, and equilibrium point [21], expressed as…”
Section: Supervised Learning Based Hamiltonian (Slh)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2) cases, is our goal. Computationally, determining only low-dimensional manifolds may be feasible, but computing selected points on higher-dimensional manifolds is possible and useful (e.g., [4]). Figure 1: Geometry of a two-timescale 3D system with a 2D normally attracting center manifold.…”
Section: Overview Of Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For small values of m, the Hamiltonian system is in singularly perturbed standard form [33], and the system can be expected to evolve on disparate timescales. Using the twotimescale geometry to solve the boundary-value problem has been addressed in [4,23,49,58]. Here we focus on applying FTLA to the Hamiltonian system (51) to diagnose twotimescale behavior and locate points on the center manifold, which is in this case a slow manifold.…”
Section: D Hamiltonian System: Mass-spring-damper Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations