2020
DOI: 10.1007/s13202-020-00868-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Approximate solution for pressure behavior during a multiple rate injectivity test

Abstract: The pressure response during a well test provides important information about reservoir properties, well productivity or reservoir performance. In order to have an option to replace traditional production tests, avoiding the gas flaring and increasing operational safety, injectivity test began to play an important role in the management of reservoirs. Although analytical models are able to describe injection and falloff periods, multiple rate models still need to be developed. This work presents a new formulat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, Bonafé et al [4] presented a new formulation to approximate the pressure response at the well during injectivity tests. The solution considered multiple flow rates in a single layer reservoir.…”
Section: Reservoir Systems Under Two Phase Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, Bonafé et al [4] presented a new formulation to approximate the pressure response at the well during injectivity tests. The solution considered multiple flow rates in a single layer reservoir.…”
Section: Reservoir Systems Under Two Phase Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Injectivity tests are an alternative to conventional well testing [1,7,8]. This procedure is based on pressure transient analysis due to the injection of an external fluid into the reservoir [9,10].…”
Section: List Of Tablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This procedure is based on pressure transient analysis due to the injection of an external fluid into the reservoir [9,10]. Injectivity tests have gained more attention recently, as they are operationally safer and avoid dealing with the produced fluid disposal or flaring -hence, presenting lower environmental impact than conventional well testing [7,8]. The reduced carbon footprint compared to conventional well testing becomes particularly important considering that many oil field companies committed to substantially decrease greenhouse gas emissions in a foreseeable future.…”
Section: List Of Tablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations