2014
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.112.082001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Approximate Next-to-Next-to-Leading Order Corrections to Hadronic Jet Production

Abstract: We determine dominant next-to-next-to-leading order QCD corrections to single-inclusive jet production at the LHC and Tevatron, using the established threshold resummation framework. In contrast to previous literature on this topic, our study incorporates all of the following features: (1) It properly accounts for the way a jet is defined in experiment and treated in available full next-to-leading order calculations, (2) It includes the three leading classes of logarithmic terms in the perturbative expansion, … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
68
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The implementation of jet mass corrections [34] to our aNNLO formalism is left for future work. Although they will in particular introduce a dependence on the jet radius R, the impact of these additional corrections is expected to be even smaller than the one of the aNNLO contributions as a whole, in particular when R ¼ 1 as in this study, where terms ln R obviously disappear.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The implementation of jet mass corrections [34] to our aNNLO formalism is left for future work. Although they will in particular introduce a dependence on the jet radius R, the impact of these additional corrections is expected to be even smaller than the one of the aNNLO contributions as a whole, in particular when R ¼ 1 as in this study, where terms ln R obviously disappear.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More important is the reduction of the scale uncertainty in particular at large p T , which strengthens our confidence in the perturbative calculation. Strictly speaking, the aNNLO formalism described above applies to massless jets [34], whereas experimentally jets are defined with an algorithm and have nonvanishing mass. Work on implementing the jet mass corrections is currently in progress.…”
Section: Theoretical Formalismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, NNLO corrections are not available for two datasets included in our fit: the vector boson transverse momentum distribution and the W + c rapidity distribution (since there are no NNLO calculations for V +jets and V +heavy quarks). For the jet inclusive cross section, only the gg-channel has been recently computed at NNLO [82,99], while for the full cross section only an approximate NNLO prediction based on threshold resummation is available [100]. For all other observables included in the fit the cross sections are known up to NNLO.…”
Section: Theoretical Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[36]. In principle, a LO calculation of single inclusive jet production has certain limitations since only at next-to-leading order (NLO) the QCD structure of the jet starts to play a role in the theoretical description of physical observables [37,38], for example a LO calculation cannot be used to study the dependence of CNM effects on the jet cone radius R. Unlike final-state quark-gluon plasma effects, however, the dependence of initial-state effects on the jet cone radius is expected to be very small [39]. Furthermore, quantitatively the NLO and LO cross sections are very similar for intermediate jet radii R ∼ 0.4.…”
Section: Cold Nuclear Matter Energy Loss In P+a Collisionsmentioning
confidence: 99%