1960
DOI: 10.2307/2003014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Approximate Methods of Higher Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 263 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These assumed expressions are then usually substituted into a variational statement of the original 3D model (usually the Cauchy continuum model) to carry out the integration through the small dimensions to reduce the original 3D formulation into a one-dimensional (1D) formulation in terms of the beam axis for beams, and 2D formulation for plates/shells. This is essentially the application of the Kantorovich method [16] to composite structures. When this method is used to construct the Kirchhoff-Love model for composite laminates, it is also called CLT To derive CLT for a composite laminate, the axiomatic method first introduces the so-called Kirchhoff-Love assumptions to express the displacement field as…”
Section: Kirchhoff-love Model Derived Using the Axiomatic Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These assumed expressions are then usually substituted into a variational statement of the original 3D model (usually the Cauchy continuum model) to carry out the integration through the small dimensions to reduce the original 3D formulation into a one-dimensional (1D) formulation in terms of the beam axis for beams, and 2D formulation for plates/shells. This is essentially the application of the Kantorovich method [16] to composite structures. When this method is used to construct the Kirchhoff-Love model for composite laminates, it is also called CLT To derive CLT for a composite laminate, the axiomatic method first introduces the so-called Kirchhoff-Love assumptions to express the displacement field as…”
Section: Kirchhoff-love Model Derived Using the Axiomatic Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In strength of materials, we have learned the following formulas for beams made of a single isotropic material: (16) with EA denoting the extension stiffness, GJ the torsion stiffness, and EI 2 and EI 3 the bending stiffness about x 2 and x 3 , respectively. It is also noted here for a single isotropic material, E is the Young's modulus, G is the shear modulus, A is the cross-sectional area, J is the torsion constant, and I 2 and I 3 are the area moments of inertia about x 2 and x 3 , respectively.…”
Section: Euler-bernoulli Beam Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In view of the zero-asymptotic of the coefficients in system (22), it can be solved by implementing the simple reduction method [47] implying a finite number of terms in expressions (12). This leads to the following finite system of equations:…”
Section: Solution Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In view of the zero‐asymptotic of the coefficients in system (), it can be solved by implementing the simple reduction method [47] implying a finite number of terms in expressions (). This leads to the following finite system of equations: k=1Nμ=14Mm,kfalse[λ,μfalse]Ckfalse[μfalse]badbreak=Kmfalse[λfalse],0.28em0.28em0.28emλ0.16emgoodbreak=1,2,3,4,0.28em0.28emm0.16emgoodbreak=1,2,,N.$$\begin{equation}\sum_{k = 1}^N {\sum_{\mu = 1}^4 {M_{m,k}^{[\lambda ,\mu ]}C_k^{[\mu ]}} } = K_m^{[\lambda ]},\;\;\;\lambda \, = 1,2,3,4,\;\;m\, = 1,2,\ldots,N.\end{equation}$$…”
Section: Solution Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%