2014
DOI: 10.1002/int.21704
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Approximate Counting of Graphical Models via MCMC Revisited

Abstract: Abstract. We apply MCMC sampling to approximately calculate some quantities, and discuss their implications for learning directed and acyclic graphs (DAGs) from data. Specifically, we calculate the approximate ratio of essential graphs (EGs) to DAGs for up to 31 nodes. Our ratios suggest that the average Markov equivalence class is small. We show that a large majority of the classes seem to have a size that is close to the average size. This suggests that one should not expect more than a moderate gain in effi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If the operators then fulfill the aperiodicity, irreducibility and reversibility criteria, and k transitions are performed before sampling a state, each state has equal probability of being sampled when k → ∞. This approach has been successfully applied to all three CG interpretations [18,32,33] and the results presented in this chapter are based on it. In Section 5.1 we first discuss how good the approximations are and 23 CHAPTER 5.…”
Section: Expressivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the operators then fulfill the aperiodicity, irreducibility and reversibility criteria, and k transitions are performed before sampling a state, each state has equal probability of being sampled when k → ∞. This approach has been successfully applied to all three CG interpretations [18,32,33] and the results presented in this chapter are based on it. In Section 5.1 we first discuss how good the approximations are and 23 CHAPTER 5.…”
Section: Expressivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For AMP CGs we have two different unique representations, the largest deflagged graphs [17] and the AMP essential graphs [3] while for MVR CGs we have the essential MVR CGs [19]. All of these have been proven to be unique for the interpretation and Markov equivalence class they represent [3,9,17,19]. Definition 1.…”
Section: Unique Representationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I(G * ) = I(H) and A←B is in H. Definition 4. Essential MVR CG [19] A graph G * is said to be the essential MVR CG of a MVR CG G if it has the same skeleton as G and contains all and only the arrowheads common to every MVR CG in the Markov equivalence class of G.…”
Section: Unique Representationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations