2020
DOI: 10.1080/25729861.2020.1756632
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Appropriations, conflicts and subversions: the social construction of the Brazilian Forest Code

Abstract: It is often said that Brazil has some of the most advanced forest laws in the world, but this strong legislation has been rarely translated into effective environmental governance. To understand the challenges of implementing environmental policies in Brazil and elsewhere, this study conceptualizes the Forest Code as a socially constructed technology, the effects of which emerge from its specific uses. We find that, in contrast to the prevailing view of this law as having no effects in practice, it produced mu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 49 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Plant stones, like the other forms of inquiry that I articulate in this archaeological case study, offer a kind of critical look at how our current legislation regarding what the Atlantic Forest is has been scientifically, historically, and ecologically constructed and how it might be “negotiated” differently (Hall 1995). The point is not merely that the “wilderness” at Santa Mônica amounts to a “politico‐juridico‐scientific hybrid” (Castro 2016, 54) or “socially constructed technology” (Rajão, Carvalho, and Merry 2020, 47). My intention is to show in detail how producing this ecology as a historical monument has involved actively “silencing” others and how those other ecologies are not really somewhere repressed in the past but inscribed in existing ways of knowing about and managing this environment (Foucault 1978; Trouillot 1995, 2000).…”
Section: Producing the Pastmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plant stones, like the other forms of inquiry that I articulate in this archaeological case study, offer a kind of critical look at how our current legislation regarding what the Atlantic Forest is has been scientifically, historically, and ecologically constructed and how it might be “negotiated” differently (Hall 1995). The point is not merely that the “wilderness” at Santa Mônica amounts to a “politico‐juridico‐scientific hybrid” (Castro 2016, 54) or “socially constructed technology” (Rajão, Carvalho, and Merry 2020, 47). My intention is to show in detail how producing this ecology as a historical monument has involved actively “silencing” others and how those other ecologies are not really somewhere repressed in the past but inscribed in existing ways of knowing about and managing this environment (Foucault 1978; Trouillot 1995, 2000).…”
Section: Producing the Pastmentioning
confidence: 99%