2005
DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzi047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Appropriateness of total hip joint replacement

Abstract: We identified a low percentage of inappropriate indications and differences in some outcomes between centres. Compared with previously, there has been improvement in the use of this technique, although both periods are not methodologically comparable.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, these differences need to be considered when evaluating indications and thresholds for surgery, because many guidelines are based on the degree of pain and function on presentation [1,35]. Further studies to elucidate the nature of the differences therefore are required; if they reflect barriers to access, these should be addressed and eliminated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these differences need to be considered when evaluating indications and thresholds for surgery, because many guidelines are based on the degree of pain and function on presentation [1,35]. Further studies to elucidate the nature of the differences therefore are required; if they reflect barriers to access, these should be addressed and eliminated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If none of the conditions was met, previous medical management was considered inadequate [20][21][22][23] .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary outcome measure was the clinical appropriateness of TJA. Clinical appropriateness for TJA, a dichotomous outcome variable, was obtained for each patient using an algorithm [20][21][22][23] . The algorithm classified each patient as either "appropriate" or "not appropriate" based on the following variables: age, adequacy of previous medical management, severity of pain, and functional limitation and surgical risk.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations