Appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing for upper respiratory tract infections in general practice: Comparison between Denmark and Iceland

Abstract

Objective: To compare the appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing for upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs) in two countries with different prevalence of antimicrobial resistance: Denmark and Iceland.Design: A cross-sectional study. Settings and subjects. General practitioners (GPs) in Denmark (n = 78) and Iceland (n = 21) registered all patients with URTI according to the Audit Project Odense (APO) method during a three-week period in the winter months of 2008 and 2009.Main outcome measures: Appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing in patients with URTI in Denmark and Iceland.Results: A total of 1428 patients were registered (Denmark: n = 1208; Iceland: n = 220). A majority of patients in both countries were prescribed antibiotics, and only a minority of the prescriptions could be classified as appropriate prescribing. In general, Icelandic GPs more often prescribed antibiotics (Iceland = 75.8% vs. Denmark = 59.3%), but Danish GPs had a higher percentage of inappropriate antibiotic prescribing for sinusitis, and Icelandic GPs for pharyngotonsillitis. No differences were found for acute otitis media (AOM). The different antibiotic prescribing patterns between Denmark and Iceland could not fully be explained by different symptoms and signs among patients.Conclusion: Icelandic GPs have a higher antibiotic prescribing rate compared with Danish GPs, but the percentage of inappropriate antibiotic prescribing is highest in Denmark for sinusitis, and in Iceland for pharyngotonsillitis.Key pointsWithin the Nordic countries there are marked differences in antimicrobial resistance and antibiotic use.Iceland differs from Denmark by a higher antibiotic prescribing rate and a higher prevalence of antimicrobial resistance.The majority of antibiotics are prescribed in primary care and most often for upper respiratory infections (URTIs).Only a minor amount of antibiotic prescriptions for URTIs can be classified as appropriate; inappropriate antibiotic prescribing is higher in Denmark than in Iceland for sinusitis and the opposite for pharyngotonsillitis.The different antibiotic prescribing patterns between Denmark and Iceland cannot be fully explained by different clinical criteria among patients.

“Appropriateness and adequacy of antibiotic prescription for upper respiratory tract infections in ambulatory health care centers in Ecuador”

“…A study about Denmark and Iceland published in 2015 [ 34 ] evaluated antibiotic prescription in URTI by general practitioners. The results demonstrate a prescription rate of 59.3% in Denmark and 75.8% in Iceland.…”

Antibiotic use for acute respiratory tract infections (ARTI) in primary care; what factors affect prescribing and why is it important? A narrative review

“…The benefits of antibiotics are marginal for the management of most cases of ARTI [ 18 – 25 ], including sore throat [ 26 , 27 ]. With few exceptions [ 28 ], inappropriate prescribing of antibiotics for patients with mainly URTI is common [ 29 – 33 ]. It is estimated that 75% of overall antibiotic prescribing takes place in primary care [ 34 ].…”

Time trends in antibiotic consumption in the elderly: Ten-year follow-up of the Spanish National Health Survey and the European Health Interview Survey for Spain (2003–2014)

“…However, patterns of use of antibiotics have become the main cause of bacterial resistance [ 2 , 3 ]. Antibiotic consumption has increased in the EU during the last 10 years, with variations between countries within the EU and countries from outside [ 4 , 5 ]. According to the European Surveillance of Antimicrobial Consumption Network (ESAC-Net), the weighted mean consumption of antibiotics by the population of the EU/EEA increased significantly between 2009 and 2013, particularly in Belgium, Ireland, Latvia, Norway, Spain, and the United Kingdom.…”