2017
DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofx163.878
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Appropriateness of a Rapid Multiplex Gastrointestinal Panel in the Investigation of Suspected Infectious Diarrhea After Implementation at an Academic Medical Center

Abstract: BackgroundThe BioFire FilmArray™ Gastrointestinal (GI) Panel is a 1 hour multiplex real-time PCR test that can detect the presence of 22 GI pathogens (viral, bacterial, and parasitic) known to cause infectious diarrhea. Our tertiary-care academic medical center implemented the GI Panel for all cases of suspected infectious diarrhea replacing the previous conventional testing once utilized to detect GI pathogens. Since its implementation we have not had any criteria for ordering this test to aid healthcare prov… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…however, at least one independent study reported doubling of costs compared to conventional methods and another study reported low conformity with institutional testing guidelines following local implementation of a real-time PCR test. 43,44 Other studies demonstrate that use of PCR tests can result in increased identification of C. difficile and other potential pathogens (e.g., Salmonella) in young children and healthy controls, potentially contributing to unnecessary treatment. 10,20,45,46 outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…however, at least one independent study reported doubling of costs compared to conventional methods and another study reported low conformity with institutional testing guidelines following local implementation of a real-time PCR test. 43,44 Other studies demonstrate that use of PCR tests can result in increased identification of C. difficile and other potential pathogens (e.g., Salmonella) in young children and healthy controls, potentially contributing to unnecessary treatment. 10,20,45,46 outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While multiplex gastrointestinal PCR studies offer improved sensitivity, decreased time to results, and improved time to initiation of antimicrobials, Cotter et al previously demonstrated a 21% overall increase in stool testing following their implementation with improvement in outcomes in only 3% of tested patients 19 . Some adult‐focused studies demonstrate that use of multiplex PCRs can contribute to reductions in healthcare expenditures including reductions in associated resources including endoscopy, diagnostic imaging, and antimicrobial use 17,42 ; however, at least one independent study reported doubling of costs compared to conventional methods and another study reported low conformity with institutional testing guidelines following local implementation of a real‐time PCR test 43,44 . Other studies demonstrate that use of PCR tests can result in increased identification of C. difficile and other potential pathogens (e.g., Salmonella ) in young children and healthy controls, potentially contributing to unnecessary treatment 10,20,45,46 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%