2013
DOI: 10.5937/fizkul1301001t
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Appropriateness and limitations of factor analysis methods utilized in psychology and kinesiology: Part II

Abstract: Метикош, Гредељ и Момировић (1979) наводе како је напуштање класичне теорије способности дефинисаних као латентне димензије, могуће остварити заменом факторских модела са таксономским моделима. Притом, исти аутори ПРЕГЛЕДНИ ЧЛАНЦИ

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
(59 reference statements)
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…First, the results of factor analysis depend on how well the factors used in analysis are defined and measured. Second, as indicated by Trninić, Jelaska and Štalec (2013), empirical studies are usually indecisive about factors that should be included to measure different latent variables (Trninić, Jelaska and Štalec, 2013, p.13). Future research can apply interviews and cross-country comparisons to provide rich information.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the results of factor analysis depend on how well the factors used in analysis are defined and measured. Second, as indicated by Trninić, Jelaska and Štalec (2013), empirical studies are usually indecisive about factors that should be included to measure different latent variables (Trninić, Jelaska and Štalec, 2013, p.13). Future research can apply interviews and cross-country comparisons to provide rich information.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although a 5-factor structure was most frequently proposed (9)(10)(11)(12), it has continuously failed to be confirmed in independent samples (12)(13)(14)(15). Interpretations of previous factor models are, furthermore, complicated by lack of sparsity (all items contribute to any factor) (16) and by coexistence of positive and negative weights (17). Finally, most previous studies investigated rather small and geographically restricted samples, raising doubts over generalization to different populations and medical systems because systematic cross-validation to assess stability and generalizability have rarely been performed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, factor analytic tests measuring efficacy should be the choice in journals in the SS's disciplines. Although widely recommended and adopted in the SSR, several unresolved issues such as the appropriate sample size, possibilities of obtaining ambiguous results, the difficulty of determining the number of factors to accept, and mathematical problems (Trninić et al, 2013) surround the techniques. The practice of factor analysis should be preceded by adequate training as the process is technical and is expected to provide an outcome for decisions.…”
Section: Factor Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%