2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.lisr.2005.08.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Appropriate use of information at the secondary school level: Understanding and avoiding plagiarism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike previous studies by Bowers (1964), McCabe andTrevino (1997), andCummings, Maddux, Harlow, andDyas (2002), which simply sought to determine the extent of the problem and which subsumed plagiarism within the very broad umbrella of academic dishonesty, this study showed that an impact can be made on student capabilities and that it can be done in a targeted fashion. Perhaps more significantly, other authors such as , Auer andKrupar (2001), andMcGregor andWilliamson (2005) have all already gone further by illustrating the kind of general confusion that exists among undergraduates (particularly with regard to proper paraphrasing and citation). Like the study by Landau, Druen, and Arcuri (2002), which shows that students can improve their skills when given constructive feedback, this study shows that instruction of almost any kind improves skills in this area of very obvious deficiency.…”
Section: Secondary Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Unlike previous studies by Bowers (1964), McCabe andTrevino (1997), andCummings, Maddux, Harlow, andDyas (2002), which simply sought to determine the extent of the problem and which subsumed plagiarism within the very broad umbrella of academic dishonesty, this study showed that an impact can be made on student capabilities and that it can be done in a targeted fashion. Perhaps more significantly, other authors such as , Auer andKrupar (2001), andMcGregor andWilliamson (2005) have all already gone further by illustrating the kind of general confusion that exists among undergraduates (particularly with regard to proper paraphrasing and citation). Like the study by Landau, Druen, and Arcuri (2002), which shows that students can improve their skills when given constructive feedback, this study shows that instruction of almost any kind improves skills in this area of very obvious deficiency.…”
Section: Secondary Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Auer and Krupar (2001), in their comprehensive discussion and literature review of the problem of "mouse click plagiarism," state that "some students do not know what plagiarism is or, if they know that it is wrong, they do not understand at what point using sources passes into plagiarism" (418). McGregor and Williamson (2005), in a qualitative study involving seventeen high school students, discovered that students who were very capable in defining plagiarism still had problems in understanding its application.…”
Section: Academic Dishonesty and Plagiarismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper adopts the general definition accepted by academics from a wide range of approaches (Yeo and Chien, 2007) that is, plagiarism involves the unauthorized use of ideas, texts and graphics extracted from a particular source without giving credit to the original creators (Elander et al, 2010;Smith et al, 2007;Yeo and Chien, 2007). Often defined institutionally rather than legally (Yorke et al, 2009), plagiarism is equivalent to stealing intellectual property (McGregor and Williamson, 2005).…”
Section: Plagiarismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned above, these techniques include interviews, either with individuals and/or in focus groups, questionnaires, observation, and examination of documents. In some studies (for example, McGregor & Williamson, 2005;Williamson, 1997), all or most of these techniques were used. With other studies, only one or two techniques have been used, in which case the study is discussed not as an ethnography but as a study using an ethnographic technique or techniques.…”
Section: Examples Of Constructivist Research Using Ethnographic Technmentioning
confidence: 99%