2007
DOI: 10.1109/tmech.2007.901943
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Appropriate Sensor Placement for Fault-Tolerant Lane-Keeping Control of Automated Vehicles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The core idea of MTTE is predicting the maximum torque, which tire/road interface is able to transfer to chassis, through estimating the adhesive force ˆd F and regulating the relaxation factor α governed by (9), (10). The schematic presentation of MTTE is shown in Fig.…”
Section: A Mttementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The core idea of MTTE is predicting the maximum torque, which tire/road interface is able to transfer to chassis, through estimating the adhesive force ˆd F and regulating the relaxation factor α governed by (9), (10). The schematic presentation of MTTE is shown in Fig.…”
Section: A Mttementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The key to traction control is antiskid control when the vehicle is driven on a slippery road. Auxiliary sensors, including acceleration sensor and chassis velocity sensor [8], [9], can be equipped to achieve more information of vehicle. The information can help TCS making use of slip ratio in nonlinear tire model to get the maximum adhesive force from tire-road surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A vision-based measurement implementation discussed in reference [18] has been demonstrated to achieve the same accuracy (i.e. cm-level) under the condition of near view as the magnetometer on the highway used in references [1], [3], and [14]. Compared with the magnetometer measurement, the vision-based measurement does not need to pave hardware devices on the current highways and therefore has lower infrastructure cost.…”
Section: Measurement Model In the Lf2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general traction control systems that need the vehicle longitudinal speed, the nondriven wheels, which are not connected to the drive machine, serve as an approximation of the speed, but it is not applicable when the vehicle is accelerated by four wheel driving system or decelerated by brakes equipped in these wheels (Hori et al, 1998;Yin et al, 2009). Other dedicated sensors, e.g., acoustic sensors (Cevher et al, 2009), optical sensors (Turner and Austin, 2000), sensors of magnetic markers (Hyeongcheol and Tomizuka, 2003;Suryanarayanan and Tomizuka, 2007), etc., which can obtain the chassis velocity, are too sensitive and reliant on the driving environment or too expensive to be applied in actual vehicles. The vehicle velocity can also be estimated in commercial products, like Electronic Stability Program (ESP) system (Zanten, 2000), in a much more complicated way inferred from other measurements, such as wheel speed, yaw rate and acceleration measurements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%