1994
DOI: 10.1016/0002-9610(94)90255-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Appropriate interpretation of indirect calorimetry for determining energy expenditure of patients in intensive care units

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…22 This degree of accuracy is much more difficult to obtain with small values for VЈ O 2 and VЈ CO 2 as selected for testing in our study. Achieving results within ±5% of predicted for a VЈ O 2 of 20 mL/min would require accuracy of ±1 mL/ min.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…22 This degree of accuracy is much more difficult to obtain with small values for VЈ O 2 and VЈ CO 2 as selected for testing in our study. Achieving results within ±5% of predicted for a VЈ O 2 of 20 mL/min would require accuracy of ±1 mL/ min.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Had trials been conducted for longer periods of time, the 95% confidence intervals for each series of trials might have been narrower. 22 Clinically, this variation creates a problem, since measurements to determine resting energy expenditure are usually made when the patient's metabolic parameters are in steady state. Steady state is determined as a time interval during which average VЈ O 2 and VЈ CO 2 change by less than 10% and average RQ changes by less than 5%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All indirect calorimetry measurements were performed at steady state (33) in room air, and the metabolic cart was calibrated at the beginning of each day. All physiologic values were within normal range, and the narrow physiologic range of RQs should be considered a sensitive indicator of measurement accuracy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data for analysis were selected from the last 10 minutes of each period according to the coefficient of variation (CV) of average VO 2 and VCO 2 across 5 consecutive 1‐minute segments, targeting a CV <5% for both gases . The mean of 5 consecutive 1‐minute segments in which the CV <5% was then calculated for use in the further analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%