2012 IEEE RO-MAN: The 21st IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication 2012
DOI: 10.1109/roman.2012.6343898
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Appropriate emotions for facial expressions of 33-DOFs android head EveR-4 H33

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pneumatic-driven androids with a larger degree of freedom than the developed CA have also been developed [15]; however, their size and drive system make it difficult to utilize them as mobile avatars. The electric-driven Android EveR-4 H33 [29] has more degrees of freedom than the developed CA. However, this Android does not have components for perceptual functions, such as a microphone or camera, and is not developed as a remote-control avatar.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pneumatic-driven androids with a larger degree of freedom than the developed CA have also been developed [15]; however, their size and drive system make it difficult to utilize them as mobile avatars. The electric-driven Android EveR-4 H33 [29] has more degrees of freedom than the developed CA. However, this Android does not have components for perceptual functions, such as a microphone or camera, and is not developed as a remote-control avatar.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the main limitations of this study is the emotion analysis scheme we used, which was limited to the six basic emotions included in the Ekman classification, where four of the emotions are negatively charged (i.e., anger, disgust, fear, sadness), while alternative approaches propose broader schemes of eight [58] or sixteen emotions [60]. An enriched set of emotions would have fueled a more fine-grained analysis of online activity.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, although numerous studies have developed androids for emotional interactions (Kobayashi and Hara, 1993;Kobayashi et al, 2000;Minato et al, 2004Minato et al, , 2006Minato et al, , 2007Weiguo et al, 2004;Ishihara et al, 2005;Matsui et al, 2005;Berns and Hirth, 2006;Blow et al, 2006;Hashimoto et al, 2006Hashimoto et al, , 2008Oh et al, 2006;Sakamoto et al, 2007;Lee et al, 2008;Takeno et al, 2008;Allison et al, 2009;Lin et al, 2009Lin et al, , 2016Kaneko et al, 2010;Becker-Asano and Ishiguro, 2011;Ahn et al, 2012;Mazzei et al, 2012;Tadesse and Priya, 2012;Cheng et al, 2013;Habib et al, 2014;Yu et al, 2014;Asheber et al, 2016;Glas et al, 2016;Marcos et al, 2016;Faraj et al, 2021;Nakata et al, 2021; Table 1), few have empirically validated the androids that were developed. First, no study validated androids' AUs coded using FACS (Ekman and Friesen, 1978;Ekman et al, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%