2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2013.08.054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Approaching the feasibility of SBVR as modeling language for ontology development: An exploratory experiment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(25 reference statements)
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The mappings proposed in this work are rooted on the structural specification of the source and target languages. With the aim of obtaining empirical evidence about the feasibility of the approach an experiment has been performed [22]. The exploratory experiment designed has allowed to compare the performance and attitudes of some groups of students building an ontology based on SBVR business rules expressions with another set of groups building an ontology based on traditional glossaries describing domain entities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mappings proposed in this work are rooted on the structural specification of the source and target languages. With the aim of obtaining empirical evidence about the feasibility of the approach an experiment has been performed [22]. The exploratory experiment designed has allowed to compare the performance and attitudes of some groups of students building an ontology based on SBVR business rules expressions with another set of groups building an ontology based on traditional glossaries describing domain entities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Este trabajo representa una réplica diferenciada del experimento descripto en Reynares, Caliusco & Galli (2014a), lo cual permite evaluar el grado de generalización de los resultados obtenidos con respecto a la factibilidad técnica de SBVR como lenguaje de modelado para el desarrollo de ontologías.…”
Section: Diseño Del Experimentounclassified
“…These possibilities became stronger with the appearance of Semantics of Business Vocabulary and Business Rules [7], [8], which has its roots in ORM2 [9], [10] and, by the authors' intent, includes options for representing ontologies (currently, OWL 2 [11]). Several authors have described and implemented transformations from SBVR to OWL 2 [12], [13], [14] (the more exhaustive list of works was analysed in [15]). The purpose of such transformations was not only for business userfriendly creation of ontologies, but also for giving a possibility to check the consistency of SBVR business vocabularies and business rules with ontology reasoners.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For supporting the fourth criterion, we have defined requirements for writing SBVR business vocabularies and business rules that allow to obtain consistent and normalized OWL 2 ontologies [17]. It is worth to mention that the third and fourth criteria, to our knowledge, yet have not been deeply examined in related works [12], [13], [14]. The fifth criterion was ensured via language independent transformation rules, which can be adapted to similar languages by setting the defined set of keywords.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%