2003
DOI: 10.1109/lcomm.2003.813816
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Approaching Shannon performance by iterative decoding of linear codes with low-density generator matrix

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
116
0
6

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 181 publications
(122 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
116
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…For the network model, we assume a random geometric graph G(N, r) model typical for wireless ad-hoc or sensor networks, where N nodes are uniformly distributed over the unit square area and a node can reliably communicate only with the nodes in its transmission range r. In each simulation run, N P parity packets are created in the precoding phase, after which b(N + N P ) = bN I Raptor packets are produced and dispersed across the network during the LT coding phase. In the precoding phase, we apply a distributed version of R = 0.95 regular (4, 76) LDGM precode with the left degree d l = 4 and the right degree d r = 76 [14]. In the LT coding phase, weakened LT code degree distribution of maximum degree d max = 66 proposed for finite-length Raptor code design is used [2].…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the network model, we assume a random geometric graph G(N, r) model typical for wireless ad-hoc or sensor networks, where N nodes are uniformly distributed over the unit square area and a node can reliably communicate only with the nodes in its transmission range r. In each simulation run, N P parity packets are created in the precoding phase, after which b(N + N P ) = bN I Raptor packets are produced and dispersed across the network during the LT coding phase. In the precoding phase, we apply a distributed version of R = 0.95 regular (4, 76) LDGM precode with the left degree d l = 4 and the right degree d r = 76 [14]. In the LT coding phase, weakened LT code degree distribution of maximum degree d max = 66 proposed for finite-length Raptor code design is used [2].…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that for the main and eavesdropper's channels the noise variances are different, hence the resulting optimal decoding rules are different. For the case of a binary symmetric channel with cross over probability p (14) where d H (y, c j i ) is the Hamming distance between the received vector y and the codeword c j i . In this case, the optimal decoding rule is obtained from (12) aŝ…”
Section: A Optimal Decodermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, low density generator matrix (LDGM) codes introduced in [14] are systematic codes with generator matrices of the form G = [I k×k |P k×(n−k) ] where P is a sparse matrix. Hence, given one of G or H, the other can be obtained, and the binary Gaussian elimination can be used for the present setup with ease.…”
Section: ) Binary Gaussian Eliminationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(When, after application of FEC, the bit error rate ceases to reduce with decreased Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR), an error floor is said to exist.) However, at least for a binary symmetric channel (BSC) it is has been analytically demonstrated [21] that concatenating two LDGM codes (applying one LDGM code after another) overcomes the onset of an error floor, while retaining LDGM's computational complexity, provided a belief-propagation (message-passing) decoding algorithm is employed. Later work [22] confirmed the findings of [21] for a Rayleigh channel and provides analysis on how best to configure LDGM codes.…”
Section: Ldgm Codesmentioning
confidence: 99%