Ontologies of English 2020
DOI: 10.1017/9781108685153.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Approaching Ontologies of English

Abstract: Research at York St John (RaY) is an institutional repository. It supports the principles of open access by making the research outputs of the University available in digital form.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ontological study of English in the context of TESOL (cf. Hall and Wicaksono, 2020a) concerns stakeholders' beliefs about the nature of the object being taught, learned, tested, and used across the globe. It also addresses how these (changing and often contradictory) conceptualizations underpin professional practice, including language pedagogy and policy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The ontological study of English in the context of TESOL (cf. Hall and Wicaksono, 2020a) concerns stakeholders' beliefs about the nature of the object being taught, learned, tested, and used across the globe. It also addresses how these (changing and often contradictory) conceptualizations underpin professional practice, including language pedagogy and policy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a series of publications, Hall and colleagues have argued for an emphasis on ontological, as well as ideological, reflection (e.g. Hall, 2021; Hall & Wicaksono, 2020a; Hall, Wicaksono, Liu, Qian, & Xu, 2017), calling for actions to promote “ontological clarity” and consequent belief change in teachers (Hall & Cunningham, 2020, p. 12).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Work on teacher ontologies of English-their beliefs about what English is-is almost completely lacking (Hall and Wicaksono 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%