2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2010.06.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Approaches to understanding and measuring interdisciplinary scientific research (IDR): A review of the literature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
423
0
12

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 567 publications
(441 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(63 reference statements)
6
423
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the title of the CINTERA project ("A Cross-Disciplinary ... Approach"), a review [2][3][4][5]7,12,[28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36] of the growing literature on building collaborative projects that transcend academic disciplines reveals that the term "cross-disciplinary" is not much used and is, at best, vaguely defined (For example, Nenseth et al 2010 [7] define "cross-disciplinary" as the borrowing of methods and perspectives by one discipline by another). As it turned out, this term actually fit our project as it was originally conceived, having as it did the goal of bringing together some very different disciplines but leaving the nature of the collaboration a bit open and underspecified.…”
Section: Integrated Research and Cinteramentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite the title of the CINTERA project ("A Cross-Disciplinary ... Approach"), a review [2][3][4][5]7,12,[28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36] of the growing literature on building collaborative projects that transcend academic disciplines reveals that the term "cross-disciplinary" is not much used and is, at best, vaguely defined (For example, Nenseth et al 2010 [7] define "cross-disciplinary" as the borrowing of methods and perspectives by one discipline by another). As it turned out, this term actually fit our project as it was originally conceived, having as it did the goal of bringing together some very different disciplines but leaving the nature of the collaboration a bit open and underspecified.…”
Section: Integrated Research and Cinteramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1095-1101), [28] (p. 24). Their work suggests that a rough consensus is emerging to designate projects with varying ranges of integration as "multidisciplinary", "interdisciplinary", or "transdisciplinary" [28][29][30][31][32][33]. Multidisciplinary projects have the least degree of integration; they are essentially a set of separate projects gathered under a single project theme but with only some dialogue among the various components at best, perhaps towards the end of the project.…”
Section: Integrated Research and Cinteramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maximum citations is received for diversity eight, from then on wards it declines. This may be partly due to average shift towards higher diversity in 1994-2003 compared to 1985-1994. To capture the aggregate trends of diversity and citations, we further grouped the diversity index into three bins {[0, 1, 2], [3,4,5], [6,7,8, 8+]} denoting low, medium and high diversity respectively. The average citations received by these groups of papers from their published year is plotted in Fig.…”
Section: A V E R a G E C I T A T I O N S R E C E I V E D Y E A R S (mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This generated tremendous interest among scientists working in scientometric and bibliometric studies, to understand the evolution of scientific disciplines, measure the impact of articles through citation analysis, discover the pattern of scientific collaboration etc [2], [3], [4]. In recent years, many studies have focused on understanding the interdisciplinarity through variety of approaches [5], [6], [7], [8], and [9], but primarily using citation data and measures based on entropy, simpson index etc [10]. A recent special issue of Nature summarizes the work on measuring interdiscplinarity and tracks the trend in interdisciplinary work across different fields from 1950 onwards [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the often quoted report of the U.S. Committee on Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research for instance, 'Interdisciplinary research (IDR) is a mode of research by teams or individuals that integrates information, data, techniques, tools, perspectives, concepts, and/or theories from two or more disciplines or bodies of specialized knowledge ' (National Research Council, 2004, p. 2). The centrality of the epistemic and cognitive dimension of integration is common in the literature on interdisciplinarity (see for instance Miller et al, 2008;Wagner et al, 2011;Green & Wolkenhauer, 2012;Defila & Di Giulio, 2015;Brister, this issue). While institutional and communicative aspects are often examined too (see for instance National Research Council, 2004, Chs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%