1997
DOI: 10.1002/9780470125885.ch4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Approaches to Three‐Dimensional Quantitative Structure‐Activity Relationships

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 175 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, it is common practice to approximate protein electrostatic potentials as a sum of the electrostatic potentials of the constituent molecular fragments (e.g., amino acid residues), neglecting the mutual polarization effects. Computations based on popular MM force fields [61][62][63][64][65][66] as well as studies of protein docking 42,48 or activity relationships 94,95 are based on such an approximation, even though breakdown of this assumption is the rule rather than the exception whenever there are charged or polar fragments (e.g., amino acid residues) in the system. It would, therefore, prove a significant advance to extend such a methodology to compute distributions of ESP atomic charges where polarization effects are explicitly considered.…”
Section: Qm/mm Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, it is common practice to approximate protein electrostatic potentials as a sum of the electrostatic potentials of the constituent molecular fragments (e.g., amino acid residues), neglecting the mutual polarization effects. Computations based on popular MM force fields [61][62][63][64][65][66] as well as studies of protein docking 42,48 or activity relationships 94,95 are based on such an approximation, even though breakdown of this assumption is the rule rather than the exception whenever there are charged or polar fragments (e.g., amino acid residues) in the system. It would, therefore, prove a significant advance to extend such a methodology to compute distributions of ESP atomic charges where polarization effects are explicitly considered.…”
Section: Qm/mm Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a matter of fact, the general limit of the CoMFA approach in predicting potencies and/or affinities of the most and least active compounds is well-known. 18,19 All of the other new derivatives were reasonably well predicted.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…In particular, concerning R - 1 , this was likely due to its biological activity (pIC 50 = 8.64), which was somewhat higher than the average activities of the 3D QSAR training set. As a matter of fact, the general limit of the CoMFA approach in predicting potencies and/or affinities of the most and least active compounds is well-known. , All of the other new derivatives were reasonably well predicted. In particular, the S enantiomers of 2 and 3 were predicted with errors as small as −0.10 and 0.07, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The identification, study, and use of quantitative structure−activity relationship (QSAR) approaches are important stages involved in the development of rational approaches in drug design. , In 1969, Hansch demonstrated the possibility of establishing mathematical functions which correlate chemical structures with biological activities of compounds. Since then, many scientists have been working on related topicsnamely, obtaining finer descriptors (pieces of chemical information employed as predictive and modeling variables), the development of new chemometric techniques and validation strategies, , and so forthaimed at providing pharmaceuticals with powerful tools which guide the design of new drugs. Thus, a large number of QSAR models dealing with many chemical families have been developed and summarized in the bibliography.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%