2015
DOI: 10.1208/s12249-015-0368-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Approaches to Quality Risk Management When Using Single-Use Systems in the Manufacture of Biologics

Abstract: Biologics manufacturing technology has made great progress in the last decade. One of the most promising new technologies is the single-use system, which has improved the efficiency of biologics manufacturing processes. To ensure safety of biologics when employing such single-use systems in the manufacturing process, various issues need to be considered including possible extractables/leachables and particles arising from the components used in single-use systems. Japanese pharmaceutical manufacturers, togethe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For SVPs ranging in size from 10 µm to the visible threshold, the limits are harmonized in the USP, EP, and JP at 6,000 and 600 per container for ≥10 µm and ≥25 µm particles, respectively, in 100 mL containers. For containers larger than 100 mL, limits are 25 per mL and 3 per mL for particles of ≥10 µm and ≥25 µm, respectively ( Ishii-Watabe et al, 2015 , Perez et al, 2016 ). For particles <10 µm, no compendial limits would be applicable, presumably this correlates to the approximate size of a human erythrocyte suggesting that particles smaller than an erythrocyte are of less concern because they are unlikely to embolize.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For SVPs ranging in size from 10 µm to the visible threshold, the limits are harmonized in the USP, EP, and JP at 6,000 and 600 per container for ≥10 µm and ≥25 µm particles, respectively, in 100 mL containers. For containers larger than 100 mL, limits are 25 per mL and 3 per mL for particles of ≥10 µm and ≥25 µm, respectively ( Ishii-Watabe et al, 2015 , Perez et al, 2016 ). For particles <10 µm, no compendial limits would be applicable, presumably this correlates to the approximate size of a human erythrocyte suggesting that particles smaller than an erythrocyte are of less concern because they are unlikely to embolize.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extractables are defined as compounds that migrate from any product-contact material when exposed to an appropriate solvent under exaggerated conditions of time and temperature, while leachables may represent a subset of extractables that are found after the interaction between product and contact material under standard operating conditions . E&Ls may include a variety of chemicals or their derivatives used in the manufacturing of SUBs, including catalysts, initiators, additives (e.g., lubricants, antioxidants, antitack, and antistatic agents), oligomers with a low degree of polymerization, adhesives, anchoring agents, adhesive resins, and irradiation-induced degradation products and oxides …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 E&Ls may include a variety of chemicals or their derivatives used in the manufacturing of SUBs, including catalysts, initiators, additives (e.g., lubricants, antioxidants, antitack, and antistatic agents), oligomers with a low degree of polymerization, adhesives, anchoring agents, adhesive resins, and irradiation-induced degradation products and oxides. 6 Extractables screening is crucial to provide a profile of potential substances that may also leach into the bioprocess to ensure no detrimental effect on the process such as those previously reported. 7−12 Regulatory bodies require that any production equipment used in biopharmaceutical manufacturing must not present any hazards to the final drug product.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%