The SAGE Handbook of Media Studies 2004
DOI: 10.4135/9781412976077.n6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Approaches to Media Texts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
27
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…van Leeuwen, 1996), as well as other categories of discourse-analytic examinations of press and media discourse (cf. Krzyżanowski, 2003;Oberhuber et al, 2005;Wodak and Busch, 2004;Wodak and Krzyżanowski, 2008). 7 Qualitative Analysis * Key Findings…”
Section: Research Design and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 91%
“…van Leeuwen, 1996), as well as other categories of discourse-analytic examinations of press and media discourse (cf. Krzyżanowski, 2003;Oberhuber et al, 2005;Wodak and Busch, 2004;Wodak and Krzyżanowski, 2008). 7 Qualitative Analysis * Key Findings…”
Section: Research Design and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Although traditionally media discourse is defined as an institutional discourse mostly based on the informative function of language (Wodak and Busch 2004), any genre of media discourse can hardly be entirely informative, i.e. its certain genre or part of it must imply subjectivity (White 2004).…”
Section: Corpora and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The former recognises the syntactic contribution to textual cohesion, as compared to non-linguistic approaches that focus primarily on the semantic dimension of coherence (Wodak and Busch 2004). The latter references the pervasive role of language during the legal process (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%