2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2004.06.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Approaches to increase physical activity: reviewing the evidence for exercise-referral schemes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
91
1
5

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
91
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…One of these identified nine randomised controlled trials (RCTs) up until 2002, and concluded that they appeared to increase physical activity levels in certain populations, namely individuals who were not sedentary but already slightly active, older adults, and those who were overweight but not obese. 8 However, the increased level of physical activity may not be sustained beyond 12 weeks. The review included six RCTs that did not involve primary care referral to exercise-referral schemes.…”
Section: Aimmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One of these identified nine randomised controlled trials (RCTs) up until 2002, and concluded that they appeared to increase physical activity levels in certain populations, namely individuals who were not sedentary but already slightly active, older adults, and those who were overweight but not obese. 8 However, the increased level of physical activity may not be sustained beyond 12 weeks. The review included six RCTs that did not involve primary care referral to exercise-referral schemes.…”
Section: Aimmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present findings are similar to these previous reviews in that it was concluded that exercise-referral schemes increased physical activity in some people. 8,10 However, exercise referral was more costly than usual care, 9 increases may not be maintained in the long term, 10 and attendance was poor.…”
Section: Comparison With Existing Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study design contrasts with other studies on exercise referral in 3 specific ways. First, the majority of studies on exercise referral tend to be from a positivist theoretical perspective [20][21][22][23][24], rather than an interpretivist perspective [15,17,18,25]. Second, the deployment of 3 data collection and analysis phases differed to traditional schemes that have a 12 week intervention [15,[26][27][28][29][30] and a 12 week follow up [31,32].…”
Section: E T Hod De Signmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, PARS have not been a universal failure with some schemes reporting sustained improvement in clients' physical activity levels and subsequent positive health indicators (NHS, 2001). Success across a number of specific schemes has also been reported (Seefeldt, Malina and Clark, 2002), although scepticism remains over changes in long term lifestyle habits (Riddoch et al 1998;Morgan 2005 (Leijon et al, 2010). Some schemes consider retention as low as 20% to be successful (Cock, Adams, Ibbestson and Baugh, 2008).…”
Section: Physical Activity Referral Schemes (Pars)mentioning
confidence: 99%