1952
DOI: 10.1093/res/iii.9.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

APPROACHES TO BEOWULF

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…39 Such a blending of symbolism with a real flesh-and-blood dragon is reiterated by Bonjour (following Fisher), who points out the compatibility of a symbolic and literal interpretation;40 whereas Gang suggests 'that the arguments by which Professor Tolkien shows that the poem may be symbolic are not cogent, and that the internal evidence is against this view, or at least against the particular symbolism that he discerns'. 41 Gang's contention is that if the poet regarded the dragon as symbolizing Evil, he would have 'told us so quite clearly and repeatedly'.42 This is not necessarily the case. The poet uses concrete imagery, in this case the dragon, as symbolism the meaning of which is not revealed openly and clearly, but is merely hinted at.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…39 Such a blending of symbolism with a real flesh-and-blood dragon is reiterated by Bonjour (following Fisher), who points out the compatibility of a symbolic and literal interpretation;40 whereas Gang suggests 'that the arguments by which Professor Tolkien shows that the poem may be symbolic are not cogent, and that the internal evidence is against this view, or at least against the particular symbolism that he discerns'. 41 Gang's contention is that if the poet regarded the dragon as symbolizing Evil, he would have 'told us so quite clearly and repeatedly'.42 This is not necessarily the case. The poet uses concrete imagery, in this case the dragon, as symbolism the meaning of which is not revealed openly and clearly, but is merely hinted at.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%