2018
DOI: 10.5334/gjgl.316
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Approaches to head movement: A critical assessment

Abstract: Heads can be spelled out higher than their merge-in position. The operation that the transformationalist generative literature uses to model this is called head movement. Government and Binding posited that the operation in question involves adjunction of a lower head to a higher head in narrow syntax. It has been noted early on, however, that this approach is highly problematic because head-adjunction violates several well-motivated constraints on syntactic structures.This overview article surveys the problem… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 We leave out of the discussion the problems inherent to Head Movement itself, pointed out in diverse critiques for decades now (at least since Chomsky 1995). See Dékány (2018) for a recent overview.…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 We leave out of the discussion the problems inherent to Head Movement itself, pointed out in diverse critiques for decades now (at least since Chomsky 1995). See Dékány (2018) for a recent overview.…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are various options to model head movement and its triggering factors. A comprehensive overview of the main conceptual alternatives and their merits can be found in Dékány (2018). For the present analyses, I adopt the reprojection approach developed in Biberauer & Roberts (2010) and Roberts (2010).…”
Section: Parametic Differences In Verb Movementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some researchers argue that head movements to be part of the narrow syntax and others as a post-syntactic movement or non-movement (i.e., a linearization process). This issue is overlooked here since, to my knowledge, no theory exists without some limitations and disadvantages (for a detailed discussion and references, see Dékány, 2018) 39) a. Basic structure b.…”
Section: The Syntax Of Tłı̨chǫ Verbal Morphologymentioning
confidence: 99%