2013
DOI: 10.1111/lnc3.12029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Approaches to Deponency

Abstract: The aim of this article is to give an overview of theoretical approaches to (generalized) deponency, i.e., morpho-syntactic phenomena in the world's languages that resemble deponent verbs in Latin (where passive morphology accompanies active syntax) in that a 'wrong form' is apparently used. The paper has three parts. First, the concept of deponency is introduced. Second, a new taxonomy of approaches is developed that extends Stump's original classification by adding two further groups: (i) form deponency, (ii… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By contrast, Müller (2011Müller ( , 2013 rejects feature underspecification and proposes a feature changing framework in OT. He proposes the notion leading form.…”
Section: Syncretismmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By contrast, Müller (2011Müller ( , 2013 rejects feature underspecification and proposes a feature changing framework in OT. He proposes the notion leading form.…”
Section: Syncretismmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It is hard to imagine how DBS can be accounted for within the frameworks of Wolf (2008) and Müller (2011Müller ( , 2013. Without extraordinary mechanisms, their frameworks incorrectly predict that in the case of Latin DBS, for example, the nominative singular of default neuter nouns would take the nominative singular marker -us and the accusative singular of nouns such as vulgus would take the accusative singular marker -um.…”
Section: Syncretismmentioning
confidence: 99%