2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10526-014-9579-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Approaches to conserving natural enemy populations in greenhouse crops: current methods and future prospects

Abstract: Biological pest control in greenhouse crops is usually based on periodical releases of mass-produced natural enemies, and this method has been successfully applied for decades. However, in some cases there are shortcomings in pest control efficacy, which often can be attributed to the poor establishment of natural enemies. Their establishment and population numbers can be enhanced by providing additional resources, such as alternative food, prey, hosts, oviposition sites or shelters. Furthermore, natural enemy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
131
1
18

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 222 publications
(158 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
0
131
1
18
Order By: Relevance
“…Almost 40% of the income of the European companies originates from invertebrate biological control agents sold for control of thrips, another 30% for control of whitefly, 12% for control of spider mites, 8% for control of aphids, and the remaining 10% for control of various other pests (Bolckmans K, personal communication 2016). Since 2005, predatory mites have contributed enormously to the growth of the market for invertebrate biological control agents as a result of: the (re)discovery of their use for control of whiteflies (Nomikou et al 2001), finding more efficient species for thrips control (Messelink et al 2006), the development of techniques to enhance dispersal and establishment of predatory mites in crops (Messelink et al 2014), and the development of new highly economic production technologies (Bolckmans et al 2005).…”
Section: Viability Of Commercial Biological Control Marketmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Almost 40% of the income of the European companies originates from invertebrate biological control agents sold for control of thrips, another 30% for control of whitefly, 12% for control of spider mites, 8% for control of aphids, and the remaining 10% for control of various other pests (Bolckmans K, personal communication 2016). Since 2005, predatory mites have contributed enormously to the growth of the market for invertebrate biological control agents as a result of: the (re)discovery of their use for control of whiteflies (Nomikou et al 2001), finding more efficient species for thrips control (Messelink et al 2006), the development of techniques to enhance dispersal and establishment of predatory mites in crops (Messelink et al 2014), and the development of new highly economic production technologies (Bolckmans et al 2005).…”
Section: Viability Of Commercial Biological Control Marketmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They review societal challenges and options for innovation, and conclude that such a policy should not concentrate on agriculture only, but needs to be developed with participation of all stakeholders, and will help ''the entire food chain-from farm to fork, from animal breeding to human food production-to cope with the challenges of the coming decades''. Within conscious agriculture, the first line of crop protection consists of strictly enforced quarantine regulations, prevention of pest development by cultural methods, host-plant resistance, classical and conservation biological control, preventative releases of natural enemies (an aspect of ABC) and use of banker plants to establish natural enemy populations before pests establish (Messelink et al 2014). When pests exceed acceptable population levels, i.e.…”
Section: And What Next?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…habitat management to favour local natural enemies, e.g. by the use of banker plants for the provision of alternative food (nectar, pollen, alternative hosts or prey), the provision of nesting or overwintering sites (Landis et al 2000;Messelink et al 2014  Inundative biological control by massive releases of natural enemies that are expected to achieve control in one or two generations. An example is mass releases of Trichogramma spp.…”
Section: Biological Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Voorafgaand aan dit project is een aantal experimenten gedaan met toplagen bestaande uit zemelen, gist, bark en schimmel-etende mijten (Grosman et al 2014 (Wade et al 2008;Messelink et al 2014). Dit is vooral een goede methode om generalistische predatoren vroegtijdig te laten vestigen wanneer plagen nog niet, of in zeer lage dichtheden aanwezig zijn.…”
Section: Inleidingunclassified