2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2010.02.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Approaches to characterise chromatographic column performance based on global parameters accounting for peak broadening and skewness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results proved that characterization of monolithic columns is highly affected by peak asymmetry, which is influenced by extra‐column contributions but also by the own nature of the column chemistry. Furthermore, these findings are in agreement with previous results in which different set of compounds were assayed, such as, diuretics and beta‐blockers , phenols , betamethasone‐17‐valerate and betamethasone‐enolaldehyde , weak and strong bases such as pyridine, quinine, nortriptyline, aniline and 4‐ethylaniline and benzene , where monolithic columns showed higher factor asymmetry compared to packed columns.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Our results proved that characterization of monolithic columns is highly affected by peak asymmetry, which is influenced by extra‐column contributions but also by the own nature of the column chemistry. Furthermore, these findings are in agreement with previous results in which different set of compounds were assayed, such as, diuretics and beta‐blockers , phenols , betamethasone‐17‐valerate and betamethasone‐enolaldehyde , weak and strong bases such as pyridine, quinine, nortriptyline, aniline and 4‐ethylaniline and benzene , where monolithic columns showed higher factor asymmetry compared to packed columns.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…These are constant, whereas the peak width yielded inside the column increases with the retention time [28]. Thus, the peaks of the least retained solutes are narrower, but for this reason, they are more strongly affected by the extra-column peak broadening.…”
Section: Efficiency and Asymmetry Changes With Mobile Phase Compositionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…That is, at a flow rate of 1 mL/min there appeared to be, in the worst case, an equivalent of up to ∼20 L of extra-column volume that could not be accounted for (Table 3, column 4). At a flow rate of 2 mL/min this discrepancy further increased to ∼30-35 L. It is important to recognize that the absolute values of these differences are dependent on how the actual extra-column peak variance is determined [41,42]. In this case, 2 ec was calculated using obtained from the 5 peak width (see Section 2.1).…”
Section: Determination Of Extra-column Dispersion Using the "No-colummentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The rationale for doing this is as follows. Although exact numerical integration of the peak (statistical moments) is considered the most accurate method, it can overestimate the variance due to errors arising from the integration limits, the baseline drift and noise [41,42]. In addition, it is more difficult to relate this value to the plate number of a peak obtained when the column is present (N obs ), because column efficiencies are usually calculated from the actual peak widths measured at specific points on the peak (either at 1/2 height, or 4 , or 5 ).…”
Section: Determination Of Extra-column Dispersion Using the "No-colummentioning
confidence: 99%