2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8809(00)00257-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Approaches to assess the environmental impact of organic farming with particular regard to Denmark

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
109
1
17

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 225 publications
(137 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
5
109
1
17
Order By: Relevance
“…Concerning the environmental and economic sustainability, our results show that increasing the EA level allows the farms to have better environmental and economic results. From an environmental point of view, several studies have reported that farms using fewer concentrates and mineral fertilisers have lower nitrogen surplus and energy consumption (Hansen et al, 2001;Paccard et al, 2003;Meul et al, 2012). In our case study, this relationship was established whatever the unit in which the indicators were expressed: per hectare or per unit of product.…”
Section: Discussion and Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Concerning the environmental and economic sustainability, our results show that increasing the EA level allows the farms to have better environmental and economic results. From an environmental point of view, several studies have reported that farms using fewer concentrates and mineral fertilisers have lower nitrogen surplus and energy consumption (Hansen et al, 2001;Paccard et al, 2003;Meul et al, 2012). In our case study, this relationship was established whatever the unit in which the indicators were expressed: per hectare or per unit of product.…”
Section: Discussion and Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…As established in our study, input self-sufficiency in organic farms is achieved through the greater use of on-farm resources and the non use of mineral fertilisers and pesticides, thereby leading to a low environmental impact per hectare (Hansen et al, 2001;Paccard et al, 2003). Our brief comparison between organic and conventional Auto++ farms shows that organic farming provides economic benefits in a situation of milk price decrease.…”
Section: Discussion and Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…For example, nitrate leaching or runoff occurs whenever nitrate accumulation in soil coincides with a period of high rainfall or irrigation. Incorporating grass and legume cover crops, long fallow periods, mineral or organic N applications at the wrong time of the year, or small plant N demand (poor crop growth) can result in large nitrate leaching losses (40,41). Case studies have shown comparable or increased potential losses (42), or decreased potential losses (43,44) due to nitrate leaching and runoff from organic N sources as compared to fertilizer N. Many of these comparisons are flawed, however, because they compare different cropping systems, different amounts of applied N, and different yield levels.…”
Section: Inorganic Versus Organic Nitrogen Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies comparing the productivity of organic practices to conventional agriculture provide an excellent example of the wide range of benefits that may result from a conversion to sustainable agricultural methods. Both organic and low-input systems increase the organic carbon content of the soil and the pools of stored nutrients, each of which are critical for long-term fertility maintenance [36]- [38].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%