2013
DOI: 10.3944/aott.2013.3012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Approach to supracondylar humerus fractures with neurovascular compromise in children

Abstract: Closed reduction should not be forced in cases with marked edema, ecchymosis, dimple sign, and absence of radial pulse. The anterior approach is the surgical approach of choice due to direct visualization of neurovascular bundle and availability of neurovascular intervention by extending the same approach.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The standard treatment for type III extension supracondylar fractures is closed reduction and percutaneous pin fixation. 4 , 5 , 6 However, there is ongoing debate about the use of crossed or parallel pin configuration for fixation of the fracture after closed reduction. 7 , 8 , 9 , 10…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The standard treatment for type III extension supracondylar fractures is closed reduction and percutaneous pin fixation. 4 , 5 , 6 However, there is ongoing debate about the use of crossed or parallel pin configuration for fixation of the fracture after closed reduction. 7 , 8 , 9 , 10…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of the Pucker sign is associated with soft tissue injury, including median nerve and brachial artery entrapment [25]. Moreover, severe displacement and difficulty in reducing fractures are expected [26]. For this reason, immediately postoperative rotational malreduction was associated with the Pucker sign.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surgical treatment is preferred in children with multiple injuries, in open fractures, in some pathologic fractures, in fractures with coexisting vascular injuries, in fractures which have a history of failed initial conservative treatment, in fractures in which the conservative treatment has no/little value such as femur neck fractures, some physeal fractures, displaced extension and flexion type humerus supracondylar fractures, displaced humerus lateral condyle fractures, femur, tibia and forearm shaft fractures in older children and adolescents and unstable pelvis and acetabulum fractures. [6,7,11,14,15] Basic Treatment Principles According to the Type of the Fracture…”
Section: Goals Of Fracture Treatment In Childrenmentioning
confidence: 99%