2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105984
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Approach to assess agroecosystem anthropic disturbance: Statistical monitoring based on earthworm populations and edaphic properties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
2
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This suggests that earthworm indices can effectively reflect the impact of human management practices, land use types, soil physicochemical properties, and other factors on soil quality, thus indirectly responding to the degree of soil degradation. Similar results were obtained by Masin, Rodriguez, Zalazar, and Godoy (2020), who reported that the degree of soil disturbance caused by human activities can be estimated by measuring earthworm biomass, diversity, and ecotype distribution in different habitats in Santa Fe, Argentina. Bartz et al (2013) investigated the range of variation in earthworm density (ind m −2 ) and species numbers in no‐till systems and defined a classification of earthworm indices for different soil qualities as follows: excellent (>200 ind m −2 and >6 species); good (100–200 ind m −2 and 4–5 species); moderate (25–100 ind m −2 and 2–3 species); and poor (<25 ind m −2 and 1 species).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This suggests that earthworm indices can effectively reflect the impact of human management practices, land use types, soil physicochemical properties, and other factors on soil quality, thus indirectly responding to the degree of soil degradation. Similar results were obtained by Masin, Rodriguez, Zalazar, and Godoy (2020), who reported that the degree of soil disturbance caused by human activities can be estimated by measuring earthworm biomass, diversity, and ecotype distribution in different habitats in Santa Fe, Argentina. Bartz et al (2013) investigated the range of variation in earthworm density (ind m −2 ) and species numbers in no‐till systems and defined a classification of earthworm indices for different soil qualities as follows: excellent (>200 ind m −2 and >6 species); good (100–200 ind m −2 and 4–5 species); moderate (25–100 ind m −2 and 2–3 species); and poor (<25 ind m −2 and 1 species).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…This suggests that earthworm indices can effectively reflect the impact of human management practices, land use types, soil physicochemical properties, and other factors on soil quality, thus indirectly responding to the degree of soil degradation. Similar results were obtained by Masin, Rodriguez, Zalazar, and Godoy (2020), who reported that the degree of soil disturbance caused by human activi- At present, earthworm biomass, abundance, and diversity may enable effective characterization of the degree of soil degradation in the Yeheshan area. Earthworm biomass performed best in assessing soil degradation among all the indices concerning earthworms in our study.…”
Section: Applicability Of Earthworm Indices Monitoringsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…They play a vital role in renewing the soil, and can only be found in soil with specific characteristics such as texture, sufficient moisture, appropriate acidity levels, and specific nutrients (KALE; KARMEGAM, 2010). Environmental degradation resulting from human activities can directly affect the quality of soil, and pose a threat to the biodiversity of living organisms (MASIN et al, 2020). According to some researchers, soil organisms that respond to changes in the environment are considered to be of great importance in maintaining soil quality, where non-vertebrate animals form the highest biomass in the soil (MIGLANI; BISHT, 2019;LUAN et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These changes were forced by the huge and increasing demand on natural resources caused by population growth, as well as rising income level. The enormous disturbance of environmental systems, such as climate change [6,7], land 2 of 16 degradation [8,9], water depletion [10,11], loss of biodiversity [12,13], and so on, spurred by substantial land-use change has attracted ongoing domestic and international concern.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%