2020
DOI: 10.3846/bm.2020.591
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Approach of scaling the level of government intervention in the financial market

Abstract: In the field of the economics’ regulation researchers so far have built the conceptual framework showing how the deadweight loss of market failures decrease and costs of the government intervention in-crease with the increased level of the government intervention. In order to quantify relationships between the level of intervention, intervention costs and the deadweight loss with econometric models it is im-portant to understand how to apply coordinates for the data points to be included in the mod… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to validate the methodology authors combined the concept described in Figure 1 and the process described in Figure 3. Based on previously developed methodology (Freimanis & Šenfelde, 2020) authors have assessed the government intervention level in the countries of the European Union, the United Kingdom, the United States, Canada and Russia (see Table 1). This assessment has been combined with regulation cost assessment to test the function IC in the Figure 1.…”
Section: Data For Methodology Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to validate the methodology authors combined the concept described in Figure 1 and the process described in Figure 3. Based on previously developed methodology (Freimanis & Šenfelde, 2020) authors have assessed the government intervention level in the countries of the European Union, the United Kingdom, the United States, Canada and Russia (see Table 1). This assessment has been combined with regulation cost assessment to test the function IC in the Figure 1.…”
Section: Data For Methodology Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%