2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2015.11.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Approach bias modification in inpatient psychiatric smokers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
73
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
4
73
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Such a criterion shift could also happen when an entire category is more salient than another. Given the previously reported increased risk of substance-related disorders in carriers of low-expressing DRD2 alleles (Morton et al, 2006; Doehring et al, 2009; Swagell et al, 2012; Voisey et al, 2012; also underpinned by a nominal TaqIA genotype effect on the smoking status in our cohort, see Table 1 ), the higher false alarm rate could also be considered a tendency to generalize reward-associated stimuli and to show a reduced ability to inhibit a response to such stimuli (see, for example, Machulska et al, 2016). This interpretation is also compatible with our previous observation in a motivated Go/Nogo learning task, in which TaqIA A1 carriers showed a selective deficit in learning the “NoGo-to-win” condition, i.e., the suppression of a motor response to obtain a reward (Richter et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Such a criterion shift could also happen when an entire category is more salient than another. Given the previously reported increased risk of substance-related disorders in carriers of low-expressing DRD2 alleles (Morton et al, 2006; Doehring et al, 2009; Swagell et al, 2012; Voisey et al, 2012; also underpinned by a nominal TaqIA genotype effect on the smoking status in our cohort, see Table 1 ), the higher false alarm rate could also be considered a tendency to generalize reward-associated stimuli and to show a reduced ability to inhibit a response to such stimuli (see, for example, Machulska et al, 2016). This interpretation is also compatible with our previous observation in a motivated Go/Nogo learning task, in which TaqIA A1 carriers showed a selective deficit in learning the “NoGo-to-win” condition, i.e., the suppression of a motor response to obtain a reward (Richter et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Recent research shows that it is not only possible to measure cognitive biases using computer-based tasks, but that such tasks have also merit in modifying existing cognitive biases to promote healthier behavior or abstinence from drug use [12]. In this instance, the Approach-Avoidance Task (AAT; [20]) has proven particularly valuable in both measuring and modifying a drug-related approach bias [18,21]. During the task, different pictures are consecutively presented on a computer screen and participants are instructed to ignore image content and to pull or push a joystick attached to the computer depending on a content-irrelevant feature of the task (i.e., pull all images rotated to the left and push all images rotated to the right).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lately, the AAT has been adapted to a training variant by changing the contingency between picture content and arm movements, namely by presenting all drug-related pictures in push-away format and all neutral pictures in pull-closer format, thus training automatic avoidance in response to drug-related stimuli. Recently, we applied four sessions of AATtraining as an add-on to a brief smoking cessation intervention to a sample of inpatient psychiatric smokers [21]. Compared to sham training where smoking-related pictures had to be pulled and pushed equally often, the AAT-training led to a larger reduction of nicotine consumption at a threemonth follow-up.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Cognitive bias modification (CBM) aims at changing these automatic tendencies towards problematic stimuli, subsequently improving maladaptive behavior. Promising effects have been shown in alcohol-dependent subjects and smokers 8,15,16 , where a CBM intervention decreased approach bias towards problematic stimuli while reducing consumption thereof. Regarding eating behavior, research has produced mixed findings 17 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%