2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2016.10.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Approach and inhibition responses to external food cues among average-weight women who binge eat and weight-matched controls

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Forty-eight colorful images each of high-calorie foods (e.g., hamburger, doughnuts, and fried chicken wings) and low-calorie foods (e.g., tomatoes, carrots) were used. All images were taken from a set previously used in our studies (Lyu and Jackson, 2016; Lyu et al, 2016, 2017), and edited to be homogeneous with respect to background color.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Forty-eight colorful images each of high-calorie foods (e.g., hamburger, doughnuts, and fried chicken wings) and low-calorie foods (e.g., tomatoes, carrots) were used. All images were taken from a set previously used in our studies (Lyu and Jackson, 2016; Lyu et al, 2016, 2017), and edited to be homogeneous with respect to background color.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One food-specific go/no-go adaptation was used to examine reaction times and task performance in women with and without binge eating and isolate food-specific inhibitory control deficits [113]. This task included images of both low and high-calorie foods and images of household items.…”
Section: Self-regulatory Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This task included images of both low and high-calorie foods and images of household items. Across six runs, the task examined go responses to high-calorie foods compared with no-go responses to household items, go responses to low-calorie foods compared with no-go responses to household items, go responses to household items compared with no-go responses to high-calorie foods, go responses to household items compared with no-go responses to low-calorie foods, go responses to high-calorie foods compared with no-go responses to low-calorie foods, and go responses to low-calorie foods compared with no-go responses to high-calorie foods [113]. Teslovich and colleagues [114] developed a similar go/no-go task that included control images of toys instead of household items and did not include the two runs that directly contrasted high-calorie go cues versus low-calorie no-go cues and vice-versa.…”
Section: Self-regulatory Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…BED patients have displayed stronger inhibitory deficits on the Go/No-go task compared with obese individuals ( 4 , 9 ). On the other hand, in both BED ( 10 ) and obesity ( 11 ), a diminished ability to inhibit responses related to food on the Go/No-go task compared with lean controls has been evidenced. These data suggest that the poor decision-making and the uncontrolled impulse may be facilitated, having as a consequence overeating in both groups.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%