Appraising the role of previously reported risk factors in epithelial ovarian cancer risk: A Mendelian randomization analysis

Abstract

Background Various risk factors have been associated with epithelial ovarian cancer risk in observational epidemiological studies. However, the causal nature of the risk factors reported, and thus their suitability as effective intervention targets, is unclear given the susceptibility of conventional observational designs to residual confounding and reverse causation. Mendelian randomization (MR) uses genetic variants as proxies for risk factors to strengthen causal inference in observational studies. We used MR to evaluate the association of 12 previously reported risk factors (reproductive, anthropometric, clinical, lifestyle, and molecular factors) with risk of invasive epithelial ovarian cancer, invasive epithelial ovarian cancer histotypes, and low malignant potential tumours. Methods and findings Genetic instruments to proxy 12 risk factors were constructed by identifying single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that were robustly ( P < 5 × 10 −8 ) and independently associated with each respective risk factor in previously reported genome-wide association studies. These risk factors included genetic liability to 3 factors (endometriosis, polycystic ovary syndrome, type 2 diabetes) scaled to reflect a 50% higher odds liability to disease. We obtained summary statistics for the association of these SNPs with risk of overall and histotype-specific invasive epithelial ovarian cancer (22,406 cases; 40,941 controls) and low malignant potential tumours (3,103 cases; 40,941 controls) from the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium (OCAC). The OCAC dataset comprises 63 genotyping project/case–control sets with participants of European ancestry recruited from 14 countries (US, Australia, Belarus, Germany, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, Norway, Canada, Poland, UK, Spain, Netherlands, and Sweden). SNPs were combined into multi-allelic inverse-variance-weighted fixed or random effects models to generate effect estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Three complementary sensitivity analyses were performed to examine violations of MR assumptions: MR–Egger regression and weighted median and mode estimators. A Bonferroni-corrected P value threshold was used to establish strong evidence ( P < 0.0042) and suggestive evidence (0.0042 < P < 0.05) for associations. In MR analyses, there was strong or suggestive evidence that 2 of the 12 risk factors were associated with invasive epithelial ovarian cancer and 8 of the 12 were associated with 1 or more invasive epithelial ovarian cancer histotypes. There was strong evidence that genetic liability to endometriosis was associated with an increased risk of invasive epithelial ovarian cancer (odds ratio [OR] per 50% higher odds liability: 1.10, 95% CI 1.06–1.15; P = 6.94 × 10 −7 ) and suggestive evidence that lifetime smoking exposure was associated wi...

PTEN/AKT/mTOR signaling mediates anticancer effects of epigallocatechin‑3‑gallate in ovarian cancer

“…Ovarian cancer is a common malignant gynecologic cancer, and patients typically present with advanced disease at the time of diagnosis due to a lack of early symptoms (34). In the past 10 years, therapeutic methods and drugs for ovarian cancer have been continuously developed, but the overall development is slow and the mortality of ovarian cancer is still increasing (35,36). Exploring novel therapeutic drugs is essential for the treatment of ovarian cancer.…”

<p>Circulating Glutamine and Alzheimer’s Disease: A Mendelian Randomization Study</p>

“…19 An extended description of the different MR methods and the different assumptions they make about pleiotropy is available elsewhere. 16,20,21 Lastly, beyond these sensitivity estimations to screen for violations to assumption (iii), further steps were taken. A leave-one-out permutation test was performed to assess whether the IVW estimate was biased by the influence of particular SNPs.…”

A multivariable Mendelian randomization to appraise the pleiotropy between intelligence, education, and bipolar disorder in relation to schizophrenia

“…The weighted mode estimator assumes the most common effect estimate among SNPs in an instrument comes from a valid instrument. Elaborate descriptions of the various MR methods and the different assumptions they make about pleiotropy are described elsewhere [38][39][40] . For the purposes of understanding how to interpret the IVW and sensitivity estimators in the present study, the IVW is the main estimator.…”